this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
281 points (97.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

9632 readers
81 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dee@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago

"Don't have money for a car? Well too bad you also don't have money for housing in an area where you won't need a car! Get fucked poors!"

[–] PochoHipster@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 year ago

No shit lol

[–] Gerula@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's easy: Ohhhh, the buyer wants something -> price increase. But it's actually cheaper -> price increase because we can't increase prices.

We win, you loose. Get over it and hand me your money!

[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's a capitalism in a nutshell

[–] pterencephalon@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

When we were looking to buy a house, I basically crossed off the list anywhere that I couldn't walk to at least some essentials, like basic groceries, pharmacy, a couple restaurants. Our new neighborhood isn't nearly as walkable as where we used to rent, but everyone else heae seemed to have the same thoughts, and it's too expensive to buy a house there.

[–] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

BRB, gonna send this to all my NIMBY neighbors

[–] Turkey_Titty_city@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

only thing that decreases prices is when supply is greater than demand.

which hasn't happened since 2008.

[–] tiredofsametab@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

It's the same here in Japan. If you're OK living 20+ minutes from the nearest station, rent drops dramatically.

[–] stevestevesteve@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And at the same time they'll pay extra for large lots and seclusion... Things that make walkability difficult or impossible.

The survey does make a distinction between a house with a small yard that's walkable vs a house with a large yard that isn't, but that doesn't paint a full picture of the trade-offs here.

[–] Hobovision@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

A reasonable length survey will never "paint a full picture". Maybe what they're trying to show is that there are a lot more people who value walkability more than is currently assumed. In most of the US you can either chose a super high density walkable area in a condo tower or a house in a car based suburb. It's possible to design neighborhoods that are walkable and can provide a reasonable amount of private outdoor space, and what this shows is people would be willing to pay for it!

[–] S_204@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We definitely paid a premium to be close to the kids school and within walking distance of a grocery store, parks, shops and transit.

100% worth it even if only for the community feeling our neighborhood and neighbors have. I can't say we'll save enough by leaving the car parked to offset the premium, but it fit the budget and it's far and away a better environment for my kids to be in. Green space is invaluable to our society.

[–] hanekam@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I did the math, and where I live the money saved from getting rid of a second car can service around $100000 worth of mortgage.

Considerably more if the car is new, used very frequently, or both

[–] Turkey_Titty_city@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What car? That number makes zero sense unless you're talking about a high cost, high maintenance luxury car.

I've had a car for 7 years. It cost me about 25K with financing, and costs me about $1300/yr to own between, gas, maintenance and insurance and, taxes. It's also current worth 15K.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 year ago

I know it's obvious. But I just went through a painful house shopping process. And I completely valued the ability to walk in the neighborhood easily. I had cheaper options without good foot access to a livable community. But I would rather just be in the community.

[–] azdood85@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No shit.

"Buyers will pay extra for bigger houses."

Who wants to pay me for my astute analysis?

[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And yet people are out there claiming they oppose upzoning because of what it will do to their home values!