this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
139 points (90.6% liked)

Technology

63009 readers
4156 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Leaving popular platforms such as Instagram could mean that LGBTQIA+ users lose the followings and communities they have built over years

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 54 points 2 days ago

Grapple? I left Meta. There was no grappling.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It is almost as if content creators were all warned that would happen if they host everything on centralized platforms outside their control but nobody listened.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Isnt their job to be on a popular platform?

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

You can advertise your stuff on those platforms but actually publish your content on your own website.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't have to marry one single platform, though.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are there any big social media not owned by a big evil corporation?

[–] kat@orbi.camp 2 points 1 day ago

You can be there and on smaller ones too, dude.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It'd be nice if things on Meta or X just stopped sucking but giving them exactly what they want (views and clicks) isn't the way to change their policies.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm currently working getting advertising going for my contracting business, and the number of people straight getting mad at me because I refuse to use Meta and Google is too damn high. I refuse to give Meta any business whatsoever, though I might do an SEO campaign with Google/bing.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Stay strong. If they feel that strongly about using platforms that support the oligarchy they either want one or are putting profits above people. That's literally what all of this is about: screwing over people out of insatiable greed.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Aka capitalism

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

These people aren't thinking that far ahead, they just view it as a way to increase their own revenue without a thought or care as to wider consequence. I can't say I exactly blame them, we're a small town that practically lives on Facebook and these people are running respectable small businesses to support their families, but I also refuse to play the Zuck game.

[–] shortrounddev@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Can you imagine explaining to someone in 1999 that a significant amount of politics in 2025 would surround what websites we decide to spend 12 hours a day on