this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
456 points (96.5% liked)

World News

41072 readers
3605 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Soldiers put an explosive cord around the man's neck and forced him to scout buildings for eight hours. After his release, another division shot him dead.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Explosives around necks and executions..

What group does that remind me off...

[–] hark@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Remember this and the many other examples when they try to call themselves "the most moral army in the world".

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Moral and army are two words that by definition cannot go together, just pretty tokens for Israelis to feel good about their service.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

at this point they can't even claim moral superiority over Nazis let alone a world wide rank.

[–] GarlicToast@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This news article is both disturbing and interesting. The people that alerted the news agency about the event are soldiers that were there. The only other witnesses are dead.

It means there is a conflict of values inside IDF.

I would hazzard a guess that their commander ordered it and is part of the religous-Zionism movement. It's a newish subset of zionism that is very similar to Nazism. Only difference is who they want to kill (the list also includes non-religous Jews).

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

This stuff is hardly new. There is testimonies of former Israeli soldiers from 30 and 40 years ago, where they talked about randomly murdering Civilians or beating children into disability for fun and to normalize the dehumanization and annihilation of Palestinians.

https://www.haaretz.com/2024-12-23/ty-article/.premium/when-you-enter-gaza-you-are-god-inside-the-minds-of-idf-soldiers-who-commit-war-crimes/00000193-f043-d354-a59f-ff670ac80000

It was actively encouraged by leading officers to commit such atrocities, so that the lower ranks are eased into it and can say they were merely following the example of leading officers w.o. there being a paper trail of formal commands.

Zionism has been a Fascist movement for many decades.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 days ago (7 children)

"Death to Israel" is not a promotion of genocide. I wish for the state of Israel to no longer exist. Israel is predicated on genocide, and is beyond redemption. Imagine thinking that saying "death to Nazi Germany" was a genocidal statement.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

.world mods doing what they do best, being no different than reddit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dremor@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But "Death to Germany" would be if the idea was to kill or displace the majority of German.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Within a German context that in particular actually rather means death of the national idea, cf. Slime's Deutschland muss sterben, "Germany must die", which, as correctly recognised by the constitutional court, expresses a counterpoint to the Prussian/Nazi militaristic parole "Germany must live, even if we shall die". The song, taking up sentiment that the court traces back to at least 1844, turns that around into "Germany must die so we may live", reaffirming individual (and regional) freedom and identity in the face of an encroaching normative force of "Germanness".

You don't often see a constitutional court getting into analysis of a punk song but when it happens, well, it's glorious. And Nazis loathe that sentiment. Two years ago the Bundestag had a debate about regional and minority languages, the AfD was incapable of finding a single parliamentarian of theirs who spoke any. The thing is that while they're the ones shouting loudest about "protecting German culture", they're the last ones to actually value any culture from anywhere in Germany -- they want to replace everything with their own ideas, and German nationalism has been like that since pretty much forever. So, yes, Germany must die.

[–] Dremor@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Very informative, thank you.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Sure, and "happy birthday" would be a genocidal statement if the idea was to kill or displace the majority of Scottish.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 21 points 2 days ago

Well, they are getting us used to tolerating mass genocide

As someone who lives in Occupied Palestine, im not surprised. The IOF is a cruel genocidal military and the occupation government that backs them are just as bad.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So... Just point or clarity.... They used him as a human shield then killed him because he survived being a human shield or did being a human shield kill him but later?

[–] GarlicToast@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago

The group that used him as a human shield didn't kill him directly. They sent him and his wife south, because the area they were found in was considered evacuated.

When an area is considered evacuated every non-IDF person is shot on sight. They knew it, and "forgot" to update over the radio about the elderly couple that will pass through. So the next group of soldiers shot them on sight.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago

Fucking war criminals

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 65 points 3 days ago

This is why you never cooperate.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›