this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
51 points (96.4% liked)

Europe

2282 readers
1537 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sircac@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Like it or not, but with agents prone to use military force around the corner we better prepare for it one way or another, either to fight back or to subdue, because deterrence is at the weakest point since decades and most of Europe has become unused to war efforts.

I personally hate to have to do this, strength countries mutual balanced dependence that makes this undesirable for both parts is my preferred choice over spending on military resources, but lacking of that tie with those agents around…

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 21 points 16 hours ago

And taxing the rich more, right? RIGHT?

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 18 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Could it mean that we’re finally free of the arbitrarily chosen debt ceiling? This is a liberal miracle.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

They'll use the need to spend more on defense as a reason to cut down on spending for social causes.

Preaching to the choir here, but people need to strat voting more left. The AfD in Germany, currently at 20%, will just destroy the institutions weakened by moderate conservative rule.

[–] Ziggurat@fedia.io 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Don't worry, liberal are OK to let rich lend more money to the government, not to let the rich pay taxes or let inflation erode the rich's saving.

When a government gives a similar amount of interest to the rich than education spending there is something fucked up

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago

Don't worry, liberal are OK to let rich lend more money to the government, not to let the rich pay taxes or let inflation erode the rich's saving.

Rich will find a way to profit from everything but I think in this case it’ll be limited to government contracts and not profiting from the debt itself.

Government debt and public investments are a rich man’s nightmare. First of all, they can’t easily profit from it because it’s low interest due to reliability of governments in general. That means that most of this kind of debt is held by pension funds or banks that have to meet their regulatory needs on liquidity and safety.

Second, if it’s issued in a domestic currency then the debt can be devalued by issuing more currency, meaning rich lose out considerable amounts in nominal value because of how much money they are sitting on. This affects others who have most of their wealth in basic possessions like flats, cars but to a much lesser extent.

And lastly, public spending means collective bargaining and non-commercial ways of satisfying human needs like education, health etc. In the ends it’s much more cost effective for all of us.

This is an okay compromise. Ideally in a capitalist society there’d be wealth based tax that would go towards defence spending since poor have nothing to defend. That obviously won’t work since fairness is not a point in capitalism.

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

we’re finally free of the arbitrarily chosen debt ceiling?

That's what she's proposing. Considering recent events there is no other immediate way to strengthen our defense. I imagine it will be approved by the European Council.

Also, I prefer to have something protecting our lives and debt, than have nothing and die wealthy.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world -4 points 7 hours ago

Germans when their country turns right wing:

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 13 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Please Europe help us in Canada to safeguard democracy!

[–] camelbeard@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

I honestly hope this will result is a strong alliance between the EU and Canada and if possible other countries. It's kind of our own fault for relying on the US for too long, we need to make sure we can protect ourselves without the US.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Only if you join the EU /s

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I will do what I can to fulfill the chapter reforms. We could do better on food safety.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

We will flood you with sugar beet syrup and many of you will like it better than maple syrup. It's going to create a rift in your national identity.

On the upside the EU won't have a shortfall of protein crops any more you're quite literally producing lentils for the whole world.