this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
1649 points (98.3% liked)

pics

19899 readers
3509 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

I'm going to my states senate office on Monday with a megaphone and will not leave until the police are called. I'm going to write out what I want to say because I'm too heated to speak freely. Naysayers need not reply.

[–] tym@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Here's the introduction (aka "Pillar I") to the plan currently being implemented: https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

Some highlights:

From page 20 of the project: "Vought (officially in charge of OMB after being confirmed recently) writes that the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) should establish a “reputation as the keeper of ‘commander’s intent,’”"

From page 21: " In Chapter 1, former deputy chief of staff to the President Rick Dearborn writes that the White House Counsel “must take seriously the duty to protect the powers and privileges of the President from encroachments by Congress, the judiciary, and the administrative components of departments and agencies.”

Page 28: "When a new President takes office, he will need to decide expeditiously how to handle any major ongoing litigation or other pending legal matters that might present a challenge to his agenda"...", the President should hire a counsel with extensive experience with a wide range of complex legal subjects. Moreover, while a candidate with elite credentials might seem ideal, the best one will be above all loyal to the President"

Page 32, regarding the office of presidential personnel (DOGE): "Playing “bad cop” in a way that other White House offices cannot (including serving as the office that takes direct responsibility for firings and hirings)."

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 10 points 7 hours ago

Careful! This type of wording earned me my final ban from Reddit!

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 hours ago

Arm the homeless

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

23 nazis disagree with this lol

[–] Joeyfingis@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago

Save a life, punch a nazi

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

CLIP YOUR STRINGS YOU FUCKING PHILISTINE

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

That's Tom Morello, he can have 5 feet of string hanging off the end for all I care

[–] nick@midwest.social 170 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 21 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Killing Nazis is always the right thing to do. When drag is old and feeble and has no reason to live, drag will buy a gun and make the end count.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

By the time drag is old and feeble, drag will be surrounded by loved ones and not want to go out that way. Average happiness goes up with age.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

This is how the good die young, isn't it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 36 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I preferred them when they weren't so political.

/S obviously haha. I'm currently cutting a stencil that says "Nazi lives don't matter" to make some shirts.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 128 points 1 day ago (21 children)

Why are all of their songs still relevant 30 years later?

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Because things have gotten worse in the intervening 30 years?

[–] Catma@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago

Because those that work forces are still the ones that burn crosses

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 112 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Because the problems they raged about are systemic, and the system didn't change.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] MellowYellow13@lemmy.world 16 points 21 hours ago
load more comments
view more: next ›