this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
705 points (98.8% liked)

196

4691 readers
1225 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 10 points 18 hours ago

That sentence just tickles me the right way:

You watch it - and information is revealed

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Ohh that partner is sleeping in the couch tonight

[–] rippermonty@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago

While the people who ask stupid questions still have the whole bed to themselves

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The opposite problem is just as annoying. Someone insisting on explaining everything about the movie as it's happening, and causing me to miss dialogue because they won't shut up. I have eyes, I can watch the movie.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 3 points 18 hours ago

They're both instances of people talking when they shouldn't, so I wouldn't call them opposites.

Or did you think the OP post is calling the replier a jerk? No. The point is that the asker is a moron.

[–] darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, that's literally the first line of dialogue uttered in the movie: Se til helvete å komme dere vekk. Det er ikke en bikkje! Det er en slags ting!

[–] dufkm@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

In a horrible accent though, at least use an actor that speaks the language or is able to mimic it well enough for a few lines.

[–] branno@lemm.ee 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have to constantly remind my 5 year old that watching the movie explains the movie.

At least he has the excuse that he’s… ya know… 5

[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

...while watching The Thing together? ;)

[–] branno@lemm.ee 2 points 20 hours ago

He’s very mature for his age.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There are people in my family who do this.

Often times, it is just wait 3 minutes and the veil will be lifted the glory of knowledge will be yours.

Other times, it is much worse, they ask the question just after the info was revealed.

I don't often watch movies with them.

[–] nieceandtows@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (3 children)

My wife likes to talk during the movies(at home), and doesn't like it when I'm too into the movie to respond to her properly. My solution is to only watch movies with her that I have already watched and liked.

[–] beastlykings@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago

That's worse for me. If I haven't seen it, best I can do is try hard and hope I catch all the details myself.

If I have seen it? I can't help but notice that my friends are distracted during the best parts of the movie. Drives me mad. Then later they'll be like eh I guess it was ok. Ok? Ok?! You missed the best parts! Gah..

[–] towelie@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

My partner can't concentrate if I talk at all, but talking (insightful/funny, concise comments at appropriate times) is a pretty normal way my friends and I watched movies growing up. Sucks lol, how am I supposed to just sit on that obvious loop hole or horribly ADR'd line for another hour and a half??

[–] grue@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

My wife has a knack for talking over the exact moment that gives the answer as she's asking the question.

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, unless it's Mulholland Drive, or The Holy Mountain, or any number of other nonlinear or dream-like or psychedelic films.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or whatever the fuck Megalopolis was trying to do.

[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Ain't nobody explaining that shit.

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Thing (2012) really could have used a better title (and less cgi), because it isn't a remake. It's a prequel and tells the entire story of why the Norwegians are shooting at the dog in the beginning of The Thing (1982)

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] M137@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's obviously not even close to as good as the '82 one, but it's definitely worth a watch. Just keep your expectations in check, not superb but not seriously bad. There're a lot of interesting videos and articles about the making of it, and how it would have been much better without some changes that were made later in its development, so you get some cool, and sad, extra stuff after watching it.

[–] Tum@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

if I remember rightly, they had an entire props department doing the creature in the old-school way, with property and special effects, and decided in editing to replace it with CGI. Really sad. Think of how great modern physical effects could be with the advanced we made since the 80s

[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I watched them back to back recently. While the original is a cinematic masterpiece. In the remake/prequel you get to look at Mary Elizabeth Winstead for the whole movie, which is always great.

[–] Astongt615@lemmy.one 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, that reveal at the end (that it's a prequel) is kinda what made the movie worth it for me. Otherwise, knowing that, it's not nearly as enjoyable experience. But more than likely you can watch for free. So, if you like the original, why not?

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Damn. The first time I watched the 1982 movie, I watched it with Norwegians. They wanted to be helpful and translated the opening scene. I’m two for two on The Thing spoilers

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Not really. I went to see it back in theatres with a friend, and I remember our agreement was "The Thing influenced Dead Space, and Dead Space influenced 2012 Thing". It's a photocopy of a photocopy. It doesn't have a compelling story to add, and it's not very atmospheric.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 50 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

My wife does the same shit. I’m always like “I do not know, I am also watching this movie in the same real time that you are.”

[–] starchylemming@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

she wants to engage with you. you should state your speculations. if you've seen the movie already, just say something utterly outlandish to check if she actually wants to talks to you and not herself

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My wife does the same thing, but she'll also say an hour in "Brad Pitt is in this movie?" "Yes, dear, he's the main character."

[–] Shapillon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've got some mild form of prosopagnosia (face blindness) and this happens to me all the time.

An actor without a very recognizeable face sporting an unfamiliar haircut? I might recognize them 1h in or never at all.

I really like the movie/serie convention of keeping the same clothes for a character. It helps me a whole lot.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 1 points 4 hours ago

In this case she's just on her phone.

[–] oyfrog@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You forgot to mention that the movie you're watching is "The Land Before Time"

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Brad Pitt is Little Foot?

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

"you didn't brought the 4 dimensional glasses? Pity"

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That partner is an absolute hero. 🙏

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Pray for them as they sleep outside tonight.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

My wife does this all of the time.