this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
539 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19809 readers
4893 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called Elon Musk “one of the most unintelligent billionaires” she has ever met.

She criticized DOGE for placing unqualified 19-year-olds in Treasury positions and failing to do “their homework.”

Musk’s team has accessed the Treasury’s $6 trillion payment system, raising security concerns. Ocasio-Cortez warned of his “lack of intelligence and expertise,” calling him “morally vacant.”

DOGE has also shut down USAID and moved it under the State Department.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sumguyonline@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

He is legit a complete fuckfing moron. You want 1 reason, and 1 reason only? He just got access to medicare and medicaid data, HIPAA is not something you fuck with, the fines alone could literally bankrupt musk at his all time richest point, which I think is now, the largest HIPAA breach I could quickly find was 113 thousand people. Cost 5.5 million in fines alone, and was sent to the DOJ for possible criminal charges... How many peoples information is in Medicare and Medicaid? All of them? Oh dear, musk can't afford what he is doing...

I love your optimism here but what makes you so confident the DOJ are going to be able to do anything? I sadly think we're way past the point of expecting normal laws to apply to these assholes

[–] CreepyShutIn@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago

Musk is pretty normal for billionaires. Completely detached from reality, drunk on power and his own ego, convinced his every idea is divine inspiration, except the god is him.

[–] w3dd1e@lemm.ee 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This is the way. Elon Musk loves to lie about his IQ and pretend he’s smarter than he is. Trump’s favorite insult is ‘low IQ’. Find something that digs into their skin and make them throw a tantrum.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

IQ measures whether you need more education for schooling it does not test your overall ability to think. You can have a high IQ and do a lot of stupid shit.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

I bet that on top of wanting to be sure nothing that fElon is doing is disrupted or slowed down in any way, the qons didn't allow fElon to be brought in for questioning, because they don't want everyone to realize just how fucking stupid he really is.

fElon is a weird guy, but also not even half as intelligent as the carefully crafted myth he's made for himself.

Can you imagine the dipshit being grilled by members of Congress? The asshat wouldn't be able to play edgy edgelord dooooosssshbro in that venue. He'd just look like the childish idiot that he totally is. And the cons don't want to see the spell broken when it comes to the ridiculous myth of fElon.

Please, infamous hacker 4chan, come get your boy.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Can AOC run for president in the next election? Or is there some DNC blood oath that only shitty candidates can run?

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 8 points 12 hours ago

Only neoliberals can run

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 31 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah, Americans are notoriously love intelligent women, especially if they're not white.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I honestly think she has a real chance, TBH, although I can see the two cases where misogyny helped donvict into office....

I'm sure the cons and "liberal media" would do everything possible to paint her as the second coming of Karl Marx, though...even if most Americans actually agree with her policy positions on nearly everything, when you poll people on the issues.

But many Americans still think that Hillary (!) is some kind of radical leftist. Or that Obama is. Or that Biden is, or Kamala....after a while, trying to paint every single candidate as a Deep State radical Marxist fascist Communist socialist globalist (and every other stupid term they use with zero understanding of words) is going to wear off but still she has a HOOHAA is not white, so....

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Hilary Clinton was the victim of a twenty plus year campaign to paint her as a bad choice for POTUS despite being one of the most qualified candidates in history.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 minutes ago

The argument that the Butcher of Libya would have run the machinery of empire much more competently than Trump isn't an argument in her favor. I still wouldn't be able to bring myself to vote for Trump for harm reduction, but calling her qualified to hold a position which every holder in modern history has done things we hanged nazis for isn't the argument you think it is.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

In a slightly saner world she would be nobrainer. Smart, young, active, has enormous support base. In current US political climate being smart and young is a disadvantage and being a woman is a political suicide, unless you're very, very conservative.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

being smart and young is a disadvantage

I'm not so sure, Obama overcame being Bla, 2x, and part of that was due to him being smart (and young), I'm sure.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 4 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Let's run another old white moderate

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Dems won the election last time they did that.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 3 points 2 hours ago
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

If they can actually win, then: fuck yeah.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I for some inexplicable reason feel optimistic about this. I think large majority wouldn't mind as long as she had popular platform.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If she had polulist conservative platform, sure, they will vote conservative anyway, and non-sexist part of the undecided could be swayed. With left leaning however, no chance. Her core base don't vote so they will fall off, a bunch of left leaning people prefer to be outraged to solutions so they will not vote because she will check 99 boxes out of 100 and for those people it might as well be satan incarnate, and a bunch of centrists will not vote for no woman something something sandwich. The rest are racists and will be outraged that a minority has an audacity to talk.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

If her core base doesn't vote, how does she keep getting elected?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Its not a blood oath. They're a party on the center right. She's too far left for them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HairTransplants@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

he has issues

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's a Nazi. Therefore, I couldn't care less about him at all.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If only it could work like that.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It works like that. It's very simple to me.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

to me

Unfortunately, Nazis don't have a habit of leaving others be. As that famous saying goes about not having an interest in politics....politics ends up having an interest in you.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 78 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Musk is the personification of an idiot’s concept of a genius.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (4 children)

In my job I've dealt with a number of multi-millionaires and I'm usually struck by just how dumb and incompetent they are.

The economy does not reward hard work or intelligence, it rewards hubris and megalomania.

[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 11 points 16 hours ago

Those qualities occasionally help people break through to wealth, but mostly the economy rewards already being rich. Having rich parents is how you become rich.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That's why trump and maga have so much faith in him.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Yep. Weirdly, they thought EVs were going to make them gay, but now they loooooove fElon. Probably because they now realize he's maybe just as stupid as donvict.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

"The enemy is a helpless mind bogglingly stupid moron and, at the same time, a genius of cunning, destruction and evil strategy, capable of undermining every one of our moves and vigilant of our every step"

The stunlock continues at pace

load more comments
view more: next ›