this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
565 points (99.1% liked)

News

24665 readers
3556 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump is nullifying federal employee union contracts negotiated in Biden’s final days.

Affected contracts include one with the Education Department ratified just before his inauguration. Trump cited a 2010 Supreme Court decision to justify his stance but did not provide a clear legal basis.

Federal employee unions, representing 800,000 workers, vowed legal action, calling Trump’s move unlawful intimidation.

This continues Trump’s prior efforts to weaken job protections, with additional plans to reclassify and lay off civil servants.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hedhoncho@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago

I plan to throw trumps face on the ground

[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 193 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Unions have a long and violent history of not wanting to be fucked with, we'll see how well this plays out for the orange Cunt

[–] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 98 points 1 week ago
[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 week ago (11 children)

These are a bunch of civil servants, not tradespeople. Trade unions are the ones you don't fuck with.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago

Don't rule out civil servants. One thing that's great about civil service is plenty of PTO available to hit the range.

I've been out shooting, and working on my shooting drills a lot over the past month. Also been introducing more people to firearms, and hosting some first aid classes (Stop the Bleed and CPR). What have you been doing over the past month?

[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 79 points 1 week ago

Piss enough people off and it don't matter the flavor of union

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I suspect trades unions might join with them in solidarity. The civil servants would have to put themselves on the line, but I think they would have support.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Just a friendly reminder that multiple Roman emperors were killed by bureaucrats.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] teft@lemmy.world 169 points 1 week ago (1 children)

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago

Get up and get to it folks. Get sabotage manuals etc while you can, and try to do so using Tor.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 149 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Throw out the Union contact? Then union members need to... go on strike. That's the power they have, and the only reason we've been able to get some worker protections.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 100 points 1 week ago (5 children)

That's also pretty damn close to what Trump genuinely wants - for everyone currently doing the work to quit. That way he can install lackeys across the board.

Strikes normally work because the other side wants something - usually the business owner wants labor to create a product. That isn't the case here.

I'm not saying it's pointless, but the classic strategies will need to be rethought.

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 42 points 1 week ago (9 children)

unions around the country need to join in sympathy strikes

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Are there enough lackeys? If quality falls through the floor as well, won't it just further cement how dumb this whole strategy is? We may be taking lessons that it'll take a few years to learn but...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 76 points 1 week ago (2 children)

All I have to say, and I said it on that day of the RNC, but fuck that union guy for actually thinking the GOP gave 2 shots about unions after generations of fighting like Hell to gut them. Also fuck him for not endorsing the candidate who, while not necessarily a friend of unions, certainly wouldn’t have been actively working against them.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Also fuck him for not endorsing the candidate who, while not necessarily a friend of unions, certainly wouldn’t have been actively working against them.

Biden, however, was actively working against the union workers... And Harris said she would have done the same thing.

It goes back to while Trump was lying about intent to solve the problems, he at least stated publicly the problems were real.

And it goes back to Dems thinking people owe them their votes, rather than working hard to earn the votes.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I mean I can understand him not wanting to endorse Kamala when she directly told him we can win with or without you. That doesn't exactly sound like the kind of person you would want to endorse if they don't even seem to really care about you or the people you represent. But yeah endorsing Trump was a stupid move, he really should have just not endorsed either of them.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago (9 children)

At least in hindsight, it proves her wrong and that they can’t win without the unions?

So like, maybe the DNC will be self-aware enough to reflect upon this and pivot back towards more progressive, worker-friendly policies rather than the neo-liberal garbage they’ve been espousing for the better part of the 2000s?

I almost burst out laughing at the absurdity of the above, but in the words of Jim Carey’s character from Dumb and Dumber: “So you’re saying there’s a chance?”

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 66 points 1 week ago

Ignore contracts you don't like, 100% on brand

[–] riskable@programming.dev 61 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Hah! The presidency sure does provide a lot of power but he's about to find out just where that ends. If 800,000 workers go on strike he and his cronies won't be able to exist in their rich person bubbles.

The runways will be closed. The borders won't let them in or out. Public transport everywhere will stop functioning. The banks will be forced to stop letting them send money due to laws regarding transaction reporting that go through Federal union employees (I mean, I guess they could try to live their rich person lives with nothing but transactions under $10,000 🤷).

Just about everything going on in the US from a logistics and economic perspective relies on the work of Federal union employees. They don't even need to go on strike (which would technically be illegal but if Trump doesn't need to follow the law why should federal employees‽). They could just reduce everything to a crawl and it would have the same effect.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 76 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm so tired of people proclaiming that NOW finally, Trump will see the consequences of his chaotic stupidity and petulant egocentrism!

No, he's not going to "find out" anything, because he does not give a fuck who suffers and his supporters will gargle his balls no matter what he does.

You're absolutely right about the consequences of this latest crime, except for the part where Trump in any way feels anything negative about the experience.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don’t think that is how contacts work.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 8 points 6 days ago

It is for Trump. He routinely ignores contractually responsibilities on his part.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 week ago

It is if you own the courts.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)
[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

yes, yes it is. now how do we organize 15-30% of the country for meaningful direct action?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

contracts involving federal law enforcement would be exempted

So Biden’s contracts are still legitimate if saying otherwise would upset the thug class

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

After he finishes off the federal employee unions, he will pursue the destruction of the private unions creating 4th World working conditions for the US labor force. For those union members who guzzle down the Orange Kool-Aid, go piss in the wind and you fucked yourselves.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I've read pieces on how many union members (not leaders) are drinking GOP kool aid and support Trump and trumpy stuff.

In other words, everything is propaganda, and everything is screwed :(

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

Indeed, there are plenty of chauvinists, racist and 2A freaks in the unions that fail to realize they are placing their careers in jeopardy.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago

Seriously...how long before someone finds a way to put one in his brain pan? Every day he pisses a new group off...it's gotta happen sooner or later.

load more comments
view more: next ›