this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
357 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

61224 readers
6964 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 62 points 2 days ago

That's how you know you've made it in social media

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 82 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Ugurcan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Man, there’s like no day I don’t see another high quality version of this meme on Lemmy.

How many different upscaled versions do you people have exactly?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I wonder if they'll ever notice this place. Like. Before a big election or something.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

I swear they're already here. We got a couple stubborn conservative plants doing nothing but posting disinfo day in and day out. The mods of !conservative@lemmy.world are particularly sus.

[–] Dickarus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

It's always been there, it's easier to moderate them out than it is on the alternatives. Would rather still be on bsky/mastodon than whatever the fuck.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 50 points 2 days ago (3 children)

At least this anti-Ukrainian spam seems to get flagged as such in my polish corner of Bluesky. Wondering how long that will last and if we’ll see Jack Dorsey doing fascist salutes on stage too.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

As far as I know, Jack Dorsey left Bluesky almost a year ago: https://www.businessinsider.com/jack-dorsey-bluesky-twiiter-nostr-interview-2024-5

His interview on the topic: https://www.piratewires.com/p/interview-with-jack-dorsey-mike-solana

I have to somewhat agree with him that Bluesky is still very much susceptible to turning into Twitter all over again. Right now, it definitely feels like Twitter in its infancy but with all the modern QoL features we expect to have nowadays. Which is nice, of course. Twitter didn't used to be such a toxic shithole of bots and disinformation, it used to be a powerful communication tool for activism and journalists covering rapidly evolving events live.

However, the endgame of such platforms is inevitable. Higher user saturation means higher operating costs, which then usually means the company has a higher reliance on advertising, which then leads to more algorithms and data mining for targeted ads, which then leads to easier mass political manipulation campaigns.

I'm not sure if it's actually possible to attract mass audience without an algorithm driven model. Mastodon tried and it's had some moderate success, but because it's completely devoid of algorithms, users have a harder time discovering people/accounts/mindless entertainment. That's the only reason I can think of as to why Bluesky took off so much faster.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

apparently, after a recent thread on lemmy and some reading, dorsey left bluesky some time ago

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He quit and Mike Masnick, of Techdirt fame, replaced him which is a good upgrade.

Unfortunately, they still have Aaron Rodericks on trust and safety, who's cozy with Singal.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

And what's the problem with liking Signal?

[–] moe90@feddit.nl 28 points 2 days ago

it is normal because the platform is growing and then BSKY public blocklist will be bigger to counter this.

The nuclear block makes it a fools errand

[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh, good. I was worried we might actually get to keep a platform free of garbage. Whew. Can’t wait for all those conspiracy nuts to join in too!

/s

Seriously, if someone would just off Putin, that’d be great. Let Russia fall into a little civil war as smaller leaders fight amongst themselves for the scraps.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago

That is the western propaganda for justifying diminishing Russia. "If we are lucky a civil war fractures Russia into balkanized sections which the US/CIA will be able to keep divided and warmongering amongst each other. Blow up their oil. Yay!". Instead, Russians understand this war as defensive, and don't believe "NATO is a purely defensive alliance" BS, any more than non-imbeciles in west believe it, instead of willingly going along with the hateful propaganda lies because they have internalized their rulers warmongering profits as if it were a sports home team.

We can all be very thankful for Putin's restraint on nuclear strikes of US bases in Europe, or Aircarrier fleets off coast of Israel. If anything, opposition in Russia that would replace him, if impression was that Russia was losing/Putin approach was failing, would be more aggressive in ending the war once and for all.

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

If they had any that worked, they'd have used them by now.

[–] aphonefriend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago

At this point, just do it. Humanity needs a reset anyway.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am not on that platform but I'll offer a:

img

[–] labbbb2@thelemmy.club 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

"Thank you, AI !"

P.S. If Russians will be in Nurnberg court they will say something like "it's not our fault, it's putin's fault."

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

First of all, however shitty Russian regime is (you have no idea how I hate that crap), by the amount of crimes committed lately it's not worse than Turkey or Israel, or a certain superpower backing them. So if it is in that court, and those others are not, the fact alone will be ironic enough.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Bots. Bots EVERYWHERE

[–] Live_Let_Live@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

bluesky itself is russian psy op

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

"Russian influence operations" is a pompous way of saying that social media communities are big villages, and village culture gossip and bullshit and ape dynamics work there just as well.

Those "operations" are not significantly more complex than "bank support" calling you and saying you've got to tell them the 2fa code, or you lose all your money.

BTW, if something works well, it shouldn't be more complex. Just those people who designed social media to be vulnerable to such attacks - they should understand that social backdoors are just as universal as technical backdoors.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 day ago

Ukrainian source. There is Ukrainian/western warmongering/self diminishing/impoverishing disinformation/narratives, including Ukrainian propaganda reposted verbatim such as this article. All counter narratives are labelled pro-Russian disinformation. Very common on all social media.

I have no idea whether there are some bot accounts on Bluesky, but it would be "not good" if Bluesky's bans are exclusively against anti-warmongering bots, to promote the Ukrainian/NATO bots/content, which on other social media, have deeply funded "SEO scoring" already.

[–] land@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The amount of bots on that sh*tty platform is insane. I left it for Mastodon.

[–] moe90@feddit.nl 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

you know public bluesky blocklist (like this one https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:e4elbtctnfqocyfcml6h2lf7/lists/3l53cjwlt4o2s) is very effective to counter those kind of thing right?

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

I'm subscribed to block lists and at least what I see looks pretty bot free.