this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
650 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19603 readers
5316 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Senator Bernie Sanders condemned Trump’s order to freeze all federal loans and grants, calling it a “dangerous move towards authoritarianism” and “blatantly unconstitutional.”

The directive, exempting Social Security and Medicare, is expected to impact universities, nonprofits, food assistance programs, health centers, and disabled veterans.

Sanders emphasized that Congress holds the “power of the purse” and urged Americans to oppose the order.

Attorneys general are preparing legal challenges to overturn the freeze.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unless someone actually does something, he effectively is a king.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Blasts! Slams! Eviscerates!

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 1 day ago

Sliced! Diced! Julien-fries'd!

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 98 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

According to the Supreme Court, he is a king. I do not know why everyone hasn’t been absolutely freaking out about that ruling since it came down. According to that court, he is allowed to do literally anything as long as it’s an official act. This is not a rules-based society anymore.

[–] geissi@feddit.org 21 points 2 days ago

Weirdly enough, many if not most kings in history were not absolute monarchs and had to follow some rules and expectations or risk losing their power (and possibly life).

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You know what we do to kings?

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Live under their rule until they appoint another kind/queen and then they die.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is nothing that dumpy is doing that cannot be undone or re-done by a future president.

Relying on a president that changes every 4-8 years to make overwhelming changes is going to cause a lot of issues. If we thought government was dysfunctional before, just wait until it's maliciously dysfunctional.

[–] pollodehule@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I think all the suffering brought on by his stupid, selfish, cruel decisions can't just be "fixed" by the next president.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 107 points 2 days ago (19 children)

Republicans, everyone who voted for him and everyone who decided to not vote or to vote for third parties all decided that he should be king.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Absolutely. There are also Dems in Congress/Senate that have been voting yea to his bills. It's disgusting.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (42 children)

"Yeah, every single Republican hates us and are openly corrupt, but like 2 Dems (usually caucusing Independents) are also bad."

load more comments (42 replies)
[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

100% this. He's going to operate as a king, and remove anyone in his way that disagrees. He will take every concession afforded to him by the spineless Republican party and some spineless Dems also.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Majorllama@lemmy.world 89 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I feel bad for Bernie. I never agreed with his politics 100% across the board but I have the utmost respect for the man. He has stuck to his guns basically since he started. It's a real shame the Democrats shot him down to shove Hillary down our throats in 2016.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 106 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That was basically the moment when it became apparent that the Dems chose oligarchy. Had they let Bernie run and win, we wouldn’t be in this predicament. Had they chosen to prosecute crime instead of protect wealth, we wouldn’t be in this predicament.

[–] Majorllama@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but to prosecute crime would have involved going after many of their own voters and donors.

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Gasp!

Integrity? Can't have that!

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I may not personally be a fan of Bernie (hes a centrist and im a leftist) but he would be an absolutely incredible compromise candidate (granted ideally we would not need to compromise with capitalists). Sadly even a compromise between labor and capital is "too much" for the ruling class.

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago

Bernie isn't perfect, but he's been the only candidate who holds some left-leaning ideologies without being totally impossible to elect.

It's too bad he got shut down for Hillary, and now he's much too old to start a pres. term.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago

If they just follow his orders and there's no consequences for laws walked over in the process then it isn't really illegal is it?
I fucking hate this timeline.

[–] neatobuilds@lemmy.today 27 points 2 days ago

So anyway bernie started blasting

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago

The loans part doesn't even make sense, thats money that will be paid back

[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 27 points 2 days ago

I'm sure it's not legal, but I don't think that matters anymore.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm pretty sure the constitution outlines this sort of changes in budget and allocation as Congress' sole authority.

I just gave it a quick read-through and it doesn't state anywhere in Article II that he has the power to do this, and further he is required by Article II Section 3 to enforce all laws passed by congress. This is supposedly the section that they used to Impeach Bill Clinton, as his perjury in a civil case was considered breaking the law and therefor failing to enforce it.

Fun fact, the new admin has removed the Constitution from the website, promises to put it back eventually.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

He is a king and all that stuff about taxes and representation and kings has been tossed by the people.

This is what they want.

[–] uebquauntbez@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wasn't Trump f**King a porn star?

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes. Not sure why this is relevant here though.

With the definition the GOP uses he is married to a porn star as well, also not relevant here, but if we are on the topic

load more comments
view more: next ›