this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
2 points (66.7% liked)

worldnews

122 readers
31 users here now

founded 2 years ago
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eRac@lemmings.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Graham Hancock

Yeah, this can be safely assumed to be bullshit.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] UniversalMonk@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Most theories of this nature are, but I thought it was interesting.

[–] dotslashme@infosec.pub 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He has intriguing theories, and I do enjoy the series, but it should be noted that a lot of his theories have weak or non-existing support outside of his fan circle.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I would def agree with you on that point.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago

‘What I am suggesting is that the Polynesians encountered a pre-existing population on that island, evidenced by those banana [remains]... present there at least 3,000 years ago,' he told DailyMail.com. 

'And that from that pre-existing population, they inherited the older traditions and songs that we see today.'

Hancock also proposes that the statues on Easter Island are likely much older than the platforms—called Ahu Vinapu—on which many of them sit, pointing out that the two feature different construction techniques.