Won't employers just adopt the same workaround that they're using in Colorado, by posting a huge pay range and hiring all employees near the bottom?
And yet it's still better than a system where you don't have to tell prospective candidates anything at all. I'd much rather have the knowledge that they want to hire me towards the low end of their own advertised range than have no information at all.
That workaround doesn't actually work, not legally. The Colorado law specifies that the pay range has to be reasonable and they will review and cite businesses that try to pull that if a complaint is made. The NYC-specific law also worked the same. I imagine the NY State law will have a similar provision.
Doesn't mean they still won't try it mind you.
The candidate work around is to ignore the top number and apply for jobs that have a reasonable bottom number.
My employer gets around it by refusing to hire anyone in Colorado for remote jobs. Guess the same will happen for New York.
I feel like a business would have to be really dumb to rule out hiring NY'ers because of this. NY has a very educated and very large population.
Edit: I did the math. Colorado and NY have a combined college degree population of 9.9 million, or 8.9% of US degree holders.
a business would have to be really dumb
I don’t see how this is a counterargument.
Lmao you got me there.
I can get maybe blocking one state but New York AND Colorado? I'm sure California or some other larger, more progressive state will eventually make the swap too. Eventually you start cutting yourself off from not just large swaths of the american workforce, but also disproportionately from the types of hires you need (assuming remote hires still).
According to the article, California already has a similar law. I didn't dig into the details of it. Relevant bit:
A similar pay transparency ordinance has been in effect in New York City since 2022. Now, the rest of the state joins a handful of others with similar laws, including California and Colorado.
I had a feeling CA had something similar but couldn't recall and couldn't be bothered to google in the moment on my phone lol
It is required for employers here in Washington. But if the company is headquartered in a state where it is not required, they do not have to list it.
I think one long term effect of this would be driving up wages outside of states that require posted salaries, at least for some positions in some industries. There probably aren't enough businesses signing on to this idea to make much of a dent though. As a business, you're effectively reducing your own labor pool. Either way it feels like the corporate equivalent of cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Probably the same idiots whining that "no one wants to work anymore" (cue worlds tiniest violin).
They'll be out of states if we keep going then they'll naturally just cease to exist. Or, more likely, adapt to actual regulations.
That's illegal in Colorado and you should report it if you see employers listing bad faith salary ranges like that.
Pay: $40,000 - $250,000 (based on experience and qualifications)
I loathe employers that don't do this.
I threw caution to the wind once and went through 4 rounds of interviews (already a red flag) only to learn the job paid, at best, $50k less than current. I laughed thinking it was a joke...it wasn't. Well, fuck off.
I also had a job tell me the range upfront, which was nice...but it was oddly large. Yup, you guessed it, the offer despite my impressive interviewing was $1k over the low end. I laughed and told them good luck on their job search.
I straight up told a job I won't accept less than X, and after all the rigmarole, their offer was $20k under. I told them it was disingenuous of them, a waste of everyone's time, and that I would be advising my network to never apply or work for them and hung up.
Fuck these game playing companies.
See the problem here is you let them play you.
As soon a as company contacts you, ask the wage. They'll dodge the question, so you say "I notice you didn't answer my question about the wage, so what's the wage?" And you keep asking and they keep dodging until one of two things happens:
They say "we're looking for someone who is motivated by more that just money." And then you say "well people work for money, however I am also motivated by other forms of compensation like pensions and profit sharing."
They ask you to come in for an interview, and you say "I can't take the time to come in for an interview when you haven't even told me the wage yet."
It seems pretty clear you didn't need those jobs, so why are you playing along?
I'm not sure you read what I wrote? Sometimes they will spout the wage, but not adhere to it.
These were historic, nowadays I don't deal with it unless I just want to waste their time on purpose.
But you're right, I didn't need those jobs, but I'm always looking. I believe one should always be applying. There is no such thing as loyalty to one company - it doesn't typically pay off or work in your favor. In 5 years of job hopping I've tripled my base salary, that would never have happened staying put.
I don't think they "got played". They knew the situation and invested the time knowing that some companies are badly organized but actually pay reasonably. Then after determining that these companies were no good, they bailed. Should they have bailed earlier? Maybe so, but it's a gamble either way. Everyone has to use their own instincts based on their individual situations.
I'm hiring for a job. Pay range is 5k to 98k depending on various factors.
I don't apply to places that do not list a range anymore. One interview I had described a mid level job position but at the end of the interview they were only willing to pay a little above entry level. They are looking for workers in high cost of living areas. Something tells me they will be looking for a long time until they get their wake up call.
News from around the world!
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc