Check to see if there's a development looking to buy all the land in that area. You know. Like the last time police did this, and it got buried for years until public outcry made the legal system reluctantly look into and find out there were very rich people who wanted the home of Brianna Taylor, and got it for what $1.00 after she was murdered in her bed by a cop who snuck behind the house to her bedroom and opened fire.
this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
397 points (99.3% liked)
THE POLICE PROBLEM
2595 readers
57 users here now
The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.
99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.
When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.
When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."
When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.
Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.
The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.
All this is a path to a police state.
In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.
Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.
That's the solution.
♦ ♦ ♦
Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.
♦ ♦ ♦
RULES
① Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.
② If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.
③ Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.
④ Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.
Please also abide by the instance rules.
It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.
♦ ♦ ♦
ALLIES
• r/ACAB
♦ ♦ ♦
INFO
• A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions
• Cops aren't supposed to be smart
• Killings by law enforcement in Canada
• Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom
• Killings by law enforcement in the United States
• Know your rights: Filming the police
• Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)
• Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.
• Police lie under oath, a lot
• Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak
• Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street
• Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States
• When the police knock on your door
♦ ♦ ♦
ORGANIZATIONS
• NAACP
• National Police Accountability Project
• Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I found an article verifying the price, but do you have a source that connects the rest of the dots? I'm shocked (not that shocked) this isn't on screaming front page headlines
I found these articles with a little more information.
Good stuff, key point from the BI article:
Mary Ellen Wiederwohl, head of the city's economic development foundation Louisville Forward, the city's economic development organization, told local news channel Wave 3 that the updated lawsuit "is a gross mischaracterization of the project," and said that the foundation had worked with community organizations throughout. She added that the foundation is discussing the creation of a community land trust "to ensure investment without displacement."
And yet I found more using a search of "Place Based Investigations " as the main keyword: https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/politics/metro-government/2020/07/24/breonna-taylor-shooting-what-know-police-unit-linked-case/5443452002/
it was revealed that the "no-knock" warrant police used to force their way into Taylor's apartment, leading to her death, was obtained by a member of the Place-Based Investigative team.
The dots are connected enough for me. PBI obtained the no-knock, likely on Wiederwohl's initiative. Further lead: https://www.acceleratorforamerica.org/who-we-are/
Can we get this to the front page of lemmy? Brianna's story is one of injustice and this is more proof of what these cretins are able to do in broad daylight.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Why the fuck do they need to raid any house for a fucking weed eater!? That is serious small time shit.
And the thief was already in custody. He had “stored” the weed eater at the address they were supposed to be searching (er, raiding), meaning whoever would have been present there wasn’t even the thief.
Maybe because it was a judge's weed eater
Because we train cops to kill and give them military surplus and they're just itching to use it.
It was the Judge's weed eater.
load more comments
(1 replies)
They broke into his house, and he got a gun out. Which is one of the few times it is reasonable to brandish a weapon... And they use that as justification to kill him. Over a weed eater.
The police don't give a shit if someone steals your catalytic converter, your whole car, or all of your tools. But I guess if you're a judge they will kill for your weed eater.
It was stolen from a judge. So the police treated it as important. You know, the same as when a rich person is harmed
The cops deserve to reap what they sowed.
But they won't. Qualified immunity, which means they can and will murder with impunity.
They sow death so they deserve to reap death. Legality is not a factor in my proposition.
load more comments
(2 replies)
stealing the Weed Eater from a home of a local judge
Aha, so that's why they suddenly give a shit about property theft, because it was from a member of their little club.
you know, I just now realized it was a weed eater and not a weed eater
load more comments
(1 replies)
So police get to kill anyone over anything with the word 'weed' now? I can't think of any other reason to raid the home for a fucking $300 item.
It belonged to a judge so they sent a death squad after it, and cops are so fucking stupid they didn't realize the thief was already in custody. It's either that simple or they wanted this man dead for another reason.
Is this the only profession that lets you make consistent fatal errors with impunity? I really can't think of another.
There is more to this story that we will never know. You raid a home over a stolen fucking weed eater. Gross abuse of power by someone
No, it's right there in the story. The weed eater belonged to a judge, so obviously someone's gonna pay.
Death penalty for the cops, life in prison for the judge?
If only. Man, if only there were some Mario Bros that could handle something like this. They hate the forces of evil.
Even if it was the correct home. They killed the guy over a fucking weed eater. Even if he'd been violent back off and fucking let things cool down. Grab him when he goes for groceries or something. Fuck.
load more comments
(1 replies)
What's it's matter about the address. We are talking about a weed eater. Chill the fuck out.
Why did they even do anything? Whenever something is stolen from I get told there is nothing they can do but take a report.
I'm sure "judges weed eater" had nothing to do with the enhanced police response. /s
Ah, but the weed eater belonged to a judge. It wasn’t because he stole something valuable; It was because he stole from someone important.
This dude got executed by a death squad.
Either the cops are incredibly competent (likely) or they intentionally raided the wrong home as an excuse to kill this man, perhaps under judges orders.
Either the cops are incredibly competent (likely)
did you mean to say incompetent? (genuine question)
load more comments
(1 replies)
What are Kentucky police doing in London? Far from home
Nothing much, just killing some people.
So they wanted to kill this man and decided to use this flimsy excuse? I mean WTF?
"Oh don't like the cops? I guess the next time you're in trouble you'll call a crackhead?"
That does seem to have a better survival rate
This is a repeat post, so I'll repeat one of my replies partially: I wouldn’t be surprised if a suddenly vacant lot wouldn’t suddenly be auctioned off to a cop’s relative in areas with a high predominance of this. Read up on civil asset forfeiture as well. In some places, cops are basically legalized mafias.
Fuck pigs
ACAB
It sounds like the judge and police were working together to execute someone. I really can't tell incompetence from pure evil anymore.
view more: next ›