52
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Tomboys_are_Cute@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

The trashfuture bit about Britain being built on pickpocketing getting more real by the day

[-] WoofWoof91@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

that's ridiculous
it was built on mugging

[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago
[-] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

The picture of the icon on the kitchen scale is pretty funny, like they are showing a drug bust

[-] btbt@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s not their fault, the British brainpan just naturally leads people from England to do stuff like this, so the United Kingdom simply needs intervention from a civilized country to develop into an advanced nation

[-] MiguelParenti@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Why is the text misaligned and have a darker background than the UI fry

[-] DeHuq2@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Google translate. I can send you original if you want

[-] MiguelParenti@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

No i believe you

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

that's wild, their policies go back only a single century? it'd feel so weird to be calling something from the 1920s a priceless cultural artefact lol. 1900s is modern times!

[-] DeHuq2@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Russia went through two fundamental changes in the last century, with very little remaining of the previous state or culture associated with it. So yes, an art object from 1900 that went through a revolution, a world war and a collapse of soviet union is a valuable artefact.

To add: Article 1 For the purposes of this Convention, the term `cultural property’ means property which, on religious or secular grounds, is specifically designated by each State as being of importance for archaeology, prehistory, history, literature, art or science and which belongs to the following categories: . . . (e) antiquities more than one hundred years old, such as inscriptions, coins and engraved seals; (f) objects of ethnological interest; (g) property of artistic interest, such as: (i) pictures, paintings and drawings produced entirely by hand on any support and in any material (excluding industrial designs and manufactured articles decorated by hand);

https://theblueshield.org/defining-cultural-heritage-and-cultural-property/

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Russia is not unique in that. i'm just saying it's weird to imagine a time and place that's so vivid in our memory today could be in the same category as 'real' history. it's not advocacy for pinching a russian painting

[-] DeHuq2@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Althrough i am sure there are people over a hundred years alive today, i sincerely doubt russian empire is vivid in anyone's memory. Where do you think "real" history starts at?

[-] MoreAmphibians@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am sure there are people over a hundred years alive today

die-motherfucker

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

i can watch movies and listen to music recorded then. there's objects and buildings that old all over. you can read what people back then wrote almost effortlessly. there's millions of photographs!

[-] DeHuq2@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago

That still doesent change the interternational definitions of a cultural property. I dont get why you are so stubborn about it. It is called cultural property, not ancient.

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

i don't know why you chose to interpret 'a century doesn't feel that old to me' comment as some kind of attack on the concept of protecting cultural objects, but here we are. i was never arguing with you

[-] DeHuq2@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Your original comment seemed mildly insensitive to me

[-] save_vs_death@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

While 1900s sounds funny, you have to put the line somewhere. Consider that the oldest buildings today in the USA, (like for example the Jamestown Church) are basically yesterday when compared to random buildings still in use in Europe, like the Aula Palatina, some random ass church in Germany built in the year 300.

[-] charly4994@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

Well there's also the fact that settlers more or less intentionally bulldozed all the old shit in the US.

[-] WoofWoof91@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

i've drank at a pub that was older than the usa
weird to think about lol

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

sure, i appreciate it's historical it's just funny when you're used to 'history' being so much more remote than somewhere you could reasonably orient yourself in.

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
52 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15911 readers
619 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS