this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
778 points (98.6% liked)

196

16709 readers
2223 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

ID: image titled "Health Insurance CEOS and their pay:" above 8 photos of the CEO

Cigna, DAVID CORDANI $21M

WellCare, MICHAEL CARSON $23.5M

Humana, BRUCE BROUSSARD $16.3 M

CENTENE Corporation, SARAH LONDON $18.6 M

MOLINA HEALTHCARE, JOSEPH ZUBRETSKY $21.4 M

CVS Health, KAREN LYNCH $21.6 M

Elevance Health, GAIL BOUDREAUX $21.9 M

United Healthcare, BRIAN THOMPSON $10.2 M

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Missed opportunity to cross off the bottom right one.

Well it's not the only black and white pic for no reason..

It's more subtle than the x, but it sends the same message.

[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't make it, and I agree, but also that'd get it removed in an instant from most social media lol

This post would already get removed from .world

[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

It's like a mega man boss screen

[–] teije9@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hate when people don't specify monthly or yearly pay, especially with health insurance CEOs where it can be both

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I hate when people talk about executive pay without specifying both salary and stock. After all, Elon Musk supposedly earns zero salary and zero cash bonus, but seems to be getting by

[–] superkret@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago

I bet the others made fun of him at their private CEO get-togethers.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

they are all small compared to the shareholders who likely decide the company policies more than the CEOs

[–] Aux@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Here's a twist - YOU are the shareholder. One of them.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

well I sure am somehow buying products that probably goes to one of the shareholders' pockets that is for sure.

[–] Aux@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, you are the shareholder because you receive your salary into a bank account which then automatically gets invested (and unless your bank is ripping you off you should be getting a monthly interest) and you have a pension which is also invested. You are an ACTUAL shareholder.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

there is no monthly interest in regular accounts here unless you put it in a savers account. but yes I do and I know that my pension usually invests the money too without much flexibility on where to invest it in. so unless you are Ron Swanson there is no complete disconnection from this web. but the fix is easy: all I have to say is "individually major share holder" since those will be the ones deciding about company policies not me.

I think any company whose only shareholders are made up of people holding 0.000001% in shares wont suffer from the same consequences a company does when there are shareholders like %10, 20, 30 etc. Same difference between having billions or hundred thousands.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

WHY are they getting paid SO GODDAMN MUCH MONEY??

THIS IS NOT WHY WE GAVE TAX BREAKS

[–] Exec@pawb.social 5 points 1 week ago

he's the number ~~fifteeen~~ eight guy on the blaeklist

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

not small enough for the bullets to miss

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

the smallest fish in the big fish pond is still a big fish

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›