this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
130 points (98.5% liked)

Forgotten Weapons

1978 readers
5 users here now

This is a community dedicated to historical arms, mechanically unique arms, and Ian McCollum's Forgotten Weapons content.

Posts requesting an identification of a particular gun (or other arm) are welcome.

https://www.youtube.com/@ForgottenWeapons

https://www.forgottenweapons.com/

Rules:

1) Treat Others in a Civil Manner. Personal insults of other members are not welcome here. Neither are calls for violence.

2) No Contemporary Politics Historical politics that influenced designs or adoption of designs are excluded from this rule. Acknowledgement of existing laws to explain designs is also permissible, so long as comments aren't in made to advocate or oppose a policy.

3) No Advertising This rule doesn't apply to posting historical advertisements or showing more contemporary ads as a means of displaying information on an appropriate topic. The aim of this rule is to combat spam/irrelevant advertising campaigns.

4) Keep posts and discussions on Topic Keep it related to arms or Forgotten Weapons or closely adjacent content.

5) NSFW content must be marked, and is only acceptable if it is on topic. NSFW means gore or nudity. If such content is somehow on topic and is not just posted for shock value it may be allowed but must be marked.

Post Guide Lines

These are suggestions not rules.

-Provide a duration for videos. eg. [12:34]

-Provide a year to either indicate when a specific design was produced, patented, or released. If you have an older design being used in a recent conflict provide the year the picture was taken. Dates should be included to help contextualize, not necessarily give exact periods.

-Post a full URL, on mobile devices it can be hard to tell what you're clicking on if you only see "(Link)".

-Posts do not have to be just firearms. Blades, bows, etc. are also welcome.

Adjacent Communities

If you run a community that you feel might fit in dm a mod and we might add your's.

Want to Find a Museum Near You? Check out the mega thread: https://lemmy.world/post/9699481

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

3000 Cyclists of Uncle Sam

(I'm on .world ncd anymore though)

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sorry I don’t get your phrase in parenthsis?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why? did something happen?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There was some... drama with the NCD mods on sh.itjust.works, ~~and now the NCD community there is banned from Blahaj.~~ apparently unbanned, but I'm still wary of returning after that.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It’s not banned on blahaj, it was mostly a big misunderstanding.

@CDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works who is the power poster behind the community is banned from blahaj for “genocide denial”, therefore when viewing the community from blahaj it looks kind of empty.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah I saw that. But then the SJW admin “shit” cleared it up.

https://lemmy.world/post/21611929

I’m on blahaj so trust me when I say it’s not blocked from here.

Though I have to say nuke’s comments on the original thread was in my opinion unfairly inflammatory so I completely understand a boycott of the SJW community in favour of the LW one.

[–] Korval@lemmy.today 12 points 1 year ago

What I love about this is that they took a contraption that is defined by having two big wheels, and set it atop eight tiny wheels.

[–] python@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

damn, the recoil on that will have you speaking several Octaves higher

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Great for fighting retreats!

[–] thawed_caveman@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Back then, this would have been a bold combination of emerging technologies.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[–] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

I'm gonna need this next time I'm in the bike lane. No SUV is gonna cut me off now.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wow, the general shape of a bike was figured out earlier than I thought

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

And that's 1897 AD - the BC ones were similar!

the BC ones

[–] superkret@feddit.org 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but it was still a very different ride.
Wooden rims and solid rubber tires rattled your bones to bits on the prevailing cobbled roads
Ergonomics weren't well understood. With that saddle and grip position, you sat hunched over the bars in a cramped position for no good reason.
No gears or freewheel means as long as the wheels are turning, so are your legs - lot's of fun up and downhill!
No brakes. You brake by countering the pedals' movement with your legs which is really hard on the knees.
No foot retention means if you slip off the pedal with your leather-soled shoes, you're gonna have a bad time.
And the steel frame's tubes were a lot thicker, so even without the MG that bike has about twice the weight of a modern one.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

tbf, this was cutting-edge technology at the time! The Penny-Farthing had just become obsolete.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[–] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

When this getting added to execitebike?????

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago