131
submitted 22 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

With Donald Trump’s re-election, the Department of Justice (DOJ) is preparing to suspend federal criminal cases against him, as longstanding policy bars prosecuting a sitting president.

Special counsel Jack Smith, who previously pressed forward on charges related to January 6 and classified documents, must now consider unwinding these cases.

The DOJ’s stance follows a 2000 memo suggesting impeachment, not prosecution, as the proper recourse for a sitting president.

Trump’s legal team is also strategizing to dismiss or delay other cases, viewing his victory as a mandate to end “weaponization” of the justice system.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I hope that conservative piece of shit Merrick Garland is the first victim on Trump's revenge list. He intentionally let the leopard out of the cage, so his face should be first.

[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 44 points 18 hours ago

Just take a moment to marvel at the naked fiction that is law and order in this country. This is the entrenched oligarchy leaping into action, if full public view, to preserve their insulation from the very laws they use to rule you. The grotesque irony here, of course, is that this is the very “swamp” that maga dupes blab on and on about. Their lord and savior thinks so little of his moronic minions that he has no shame in flaunting his very own participation in that swamp right in front of them. Never pretend that we live in a rules-based society, nor doubt that the vast majority of Americans are among the dumbest motherfuckers to ever grace this earth. Sure assholes, take another swig of that milky self aggrievement from that feudal teet. I could not have more contempt for the reality of this fucked up, corrupt, hypocritical, and thoroughly evil nation.

[-] quicklime@lemm.ee 3 points 17 hours ago
[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 96 points 22 hours ago
[-] ThatOneKrazyKaptain@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

Had Trump won in 2020, he’d have taken the fall for the Recession and Hyperinflation and it would have caused a 2008 effect. Populist Wave haulted, strangled in it’s crib by Coronachan.

Had Trump won in 2020, he’d be done now and his VP would still be the democracy respecting Pence.

Trump when elected in 2016 had no major plan and mostly left the employees of the state intact, and in 2020 the change was minimal. Now there’s a full blown scheme to control the government

In 2020 they didn’t know how much they could get away with. They’ve seen the limits now.

Winning in 2020 means no January 6th shattering the overton window and leading SCOTUS to some interesting choices about power.

2020-2024 had one Supreme Court Justice to appoint. Now there’s another 2 if not 3

In 2020 it would have been close. Now Democrats will have to regain ground, New Jersey New Hampshire and Minnesota are now Swing States.

2016 Trump had his populist wave weakened by Gary Johnson and Evan McMulin who blocked the popular vote and kept states like Colorado and New Mexico out of his hands. 2016 Trump sucked with Hispanics. That initial wave would have burnt out with the COVID fuckery. Instead Democrats slotted in, took the 4 worst possible years, and are handing it back having effectively both given them another shot in the arm and crippled themselves. There goes the court. This isn’t John Kerry, it’s Carter.

I’ve heard of 2020 hindsight, but this is ridiculous

[-] nxn@biglemmowski.win 56 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

This is what irritates me the most. I can live with Trump being president despite how much I disagree with the idiot's concepts. But this places him, as a very orange person, above the law that others have to abide by.

These are cases that were filed before his "president" status from the result of this election and before he even became a candidate in this election. For fuck sake, this should have stopped the whole ball from rolling.

[-] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 43 points 21 hours ago

"Longstanding policy" = what we did the last time this fucker was elected. There is no precedent for this, and the entire judicial branch shrugged and said "What are you going to do?".

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 29 points 21 hours ago

Before? Make him order it.

[-] subignition@fedia.io 27 points 21 hours ago
[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

The DOJ will work for him starting January 20th. Even if they continued he would just have them drop it all that day.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 25 points 21 hours ago

"Trump’s legal team is also strategizing to dismiss or delay other cases, viewing his victory as a mandate to end “weaponization” of the justice system."

This is the part that pisses me off so fucking much. It's EXACTLY what they plan on doing and with a complete disregard for the actual law and rubber stamp judges they're going to fast track prosecution where it took years to move anything related to Trump...

I expect to see multiple arrests within the first two years as opposed to 4+ years of feet dragging for Trump...

[-] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

They're also going to pack SCOTUS and the rest of the Federal judiciary even more. Even if Trump leaves power in four years and even if we still have non-farcical elections by then, we are going to be stuck with an insane, corrupt, Taliban-esque judiciary for decades.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago

Fuck that. Crank that shit into high gear. Put him in jail and tell Vance "If you let him rot in there, you get to be president".

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago

Fuck no. Not acceptable

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 8 points 18 hours ago

I have a longstanding policy that says trump can choke on an 7 layet ecoli burrito.

I also have a longstanding policy that laws don't apply to me.

Fuck trump.

Hail Eris.

Praise Bob.

Eat the rich.

Feed the poor.

Fuck shit up.

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

What a fucking joke

[-] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Merrick Garland is a flaccid penis.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago
this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
131 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19098 readers
5193 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS