85
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mosscap@slrpnk.net 8 points 16 hours ago

How about we focus our efforts on unshittifying Earth first, eh?

[-] xj9@hexbear.net 11 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I don't think capital can sustain projects of this magnitude. Space is too harsh of an environment for delulu. We can hardly grapple with the idea that our actions on earth have consequences because of our condition. I like space stuff and I even like to create designs of starships, but I don't think we're in a position to reach for the stars just yet. Even if I'm wrong, we can't allow space fascism get started either. There is probably life out there and if space capitalism finds them, they'll try to pull another indigenous genocide and invent new forms of xenophobia to justify it.

None of our problems are technological. We have massive people problems. Building a new billions of dollar machine or trillions of dollar space station isn't going to disrupt the imperial core. The Gray Techno Fash won't suddenly become humanists because space.

Space life can be fun to think about, but techno futurism is a liberal fetish and tends to result in liberal fantasies if you don't decolonize your mind.

https://readsettlers.org tbh

[-] BreadOven@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

Space colonies. That way they can be dropped to earth to start colony independence wars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 7 points 16 hours ago

I'm not sure that fitting Earthlike habitats in giant spaceships would make sense without limitless exponential growth. Wouldn't it be more feasible to put something on the surface of a planet?

No matter how advanced our technology gets, we are not going to get around the basic constraints on energy.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 7 points 16 hours ago

Hopium huffers will smugly chant "asteroid mining!" as the answer to your questions, in much the same way that "monorail!" was chanted during that one Simpsons episode.

[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

We should be exploring both options, exploration can often lead to unexpected discoveries and technological advancement.

[-] MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml 25 points 23 hours ago

Terraforming other planets would be astronomically more challenging than fixing our own planet and we don't seem to be able to get our shit together to do that. Even if we are capable of terraforming other planets, it would take many centuries at minimum. O'Neal cylinders are far more likely to work once we start industrializing the moon.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago

Launch Billionaires into deep space without supplies

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
85 points (97.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43733 readers
1444 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS