319
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Encouraging. However, there seems to be a question missing in the discussion: why aren't more people taking the reduced hour offerings?

According to the report itself, after the first stage of trial, 86% of the working population started to negotiate for reduced hours, of the people surveyed, 51% were offered reduced hours and only 14% took them. It's an unprecedented large proportion, but still less than one would expect given the benefits. There are other factors preventing people to do so. I hope there will be a follow-up research to find out why.

[-] Benjaben@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

I think it's probably like the other commenter said, just money. I think it may be "the other thing"? Where you can have whatever rules and policies in place at the govt level, but if there's a "work hard / sacrifice for dumb reasons" culture solidly entrenched at work...well, writing's on the wall. Do that or be soft-ostracized.

I do think the rules make an impact anywhere there's a functioning government, just by slowly shifting what people see (accept?) as "normal".

[-] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 days ago

People barely survive on their income as it is, that's why

[-] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 5 days ago

From the study:

Between 2015 and 2019, following discussions between public sector employers and trade unions, Iceland saw two major public sector trials of a shorter working week for no loss in pay.

[-] IntangibleSloth@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago
[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 8 points 5 days ago

Unauthorized use of company time, you pay has bee reduced by 50% for this pay period.

[-] iceonfire1@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Reduced from 40 to 36 hours is in the right direction, but it's still a 5 day work week.

[-] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

So they can choose to take the 36 hour week, right? Guess that means they earn less if they do?

[-] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 5 days ago

The article is unclear, but the introduction on the study says:

Between 2015 and 2019, following discussions between public sector employers and trade unions, Iceland saw two major public sector trials of a shorter working week for no loss in pay.

[-] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Jeez, Scandinavian countries showing how it's done again. How come the rest of the world isn't crying in shame all day?

[-] dafo@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Sorry to be that guy, but Scandinavia is just the "peninsula", so Norway, Sweden and Denmark. The Nordics is us three, Finland, Iceland, Färöarna, Åland and Greenland. Basically what you probably think of when you think of Scandinavia.

But yes, we rule 😎

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 5 days ago

Because we're supremely good at inventing thought terminating cliches and right-wing weirdos.

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
319 points (98.8% liked)

Work Reform

9857 readers
133 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS