America's gullibility crisis (www.axios.com)

submitted 1 day ago by GiddyGap@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 41 points 1 day ago

Back in the Walter Cronkite Era, there was a thing called 'The Fairness Doctrine."

When broadcasting started with radio, there were a limited number of usable bands. The government assigned stations and laid down rules, including one that said that if you gave an editorial you had to let the other side respond. Another said that no one company could own more than two stations in a town [one AM and one FM]

After the Watergate scandal unseated Nixon, the Right realized that an independent press was a liability. As soon as Reagan got in he started trashing the old media rules and by 1996 the GOP Congress could finally destroy the old system.

You might want to watch the movie "Network." As it aged it went from cutting edge satire to staid docudrama

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

our main issue today is with 24/7 cable news and social media, neither of which were ever governed by the fairness doctrine.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

That's kind of like say because Reagan cut taxes on the rich back in the 1980s we can't change those laws.

We're never going back to the Cronkite Era but the FCC still does regulate cable TV.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The tax code is not codified in the constitution - free speech and free press is. the only reason the fairness doctrine was ever constitutional was because the public airwaves were a limited resource. That limitation does not exist on cable TV or the internet, so you're going to have a huge uphill battle through the courts to make a Neo-fairness-doctrine for cable or social media constitutional.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Further, social media crosses international borders, so it's a lot more difficult to wrangle and regulate as opposed to networks firmly operating only inside the bounds of the continental US.

[-] tja@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

I'm mad as hell 😡

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago

I want to know more!

[sorry, wrong meme]

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

You're doing your part!

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 day ago

Though there were years of buildup destroying education, social media was the endpoint. Now any dumbass with an opinion can reach a huge audience. It used to take a lot more effort to spread stupidity. I don't think we'll ever recover.

[-] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Is it a gullibility crisis or a plague of morons?

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

it’s a plague of propaganda. i don’t think people are significantly different than they were 20+ years ago, but today we have to deal with a fire hose of nonsense on social media and 24 hour news.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I once convinced someone that Italy’s flag has a pizza on it.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Let's not forget the internet has an outsized proportion of kids on it. When you're a kid, conspiracy theories sound more fun and less dumb.

Bit different when Elon Musk does it, he should know better.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

elon does know better, he just doesn’t give a shit.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I also wouldn't put it past kids to be the ones inventing and amplifying them while simultaneously not believing any of it.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

trollface.jpg

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Bit different when Elon Musk does it, he should know better.

Unfortunately, conspiracy theories attract voters. As long as these theories benefit the people in power, they'll keep spewing them even when they know they are wrong.

[-] can_you_change_your_username@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago

William Clifford might call it a problem of credulity and he might even have an idea about one of it's root causes.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago

Axios - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Axios:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.axios.com/2024/10/19/musk-ackman-election-misinformation?utm=axios_app

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024

98 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19082 readers

3505 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News