this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
296 points (99.0% liked)

Firefox

17303 readers
103 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We’ve been anticipating it for years,1 and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the ...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I hope they end up killing Chrome.

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think you're being optimistic about the number of people who both use adblockers and who care enough to switch browsers.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Yeah I fear society will get to the point in corporate autocracy, or corporate-feudalism where Google sues uBlock Origin out of existence (for lost revenue).

...and that'll be a dark day, and it will be hard not to blame the people who just put up with ads and a loss of privacy. Who can just stomach Surveillance Capitalism's incredibly flawed and one sided nature.

Those people are laying bricks for the foundation of a society I don't agree with, and don't want to participate in.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Based on every browser statistic page I can find, about 2/3 of mobile traffic is through Google Chrome. There's no ad blocker on that.

And mobile traffic is significant nowadays - it comprises around half of all traffic anywhere, despite requiring the viewer to be hunched over a phone or tablet.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Not that many people use real computers any more. At work, you may need to use a computer, but you probably can’t change the browser. At home, you have the PCMR folks who use a computer and probably also care about browsers. Everyone else just uses a tablet or a phone for browsing the web.

Speaking of the web, most people interact with specific websites through an app and an API, so they don’t even launch the mobile browser until they have to visit a site that doesn’t have an app. The world has changed and browsers aren’t as relevant as they used to be.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are there raw numbers on how many people use web browsers in general? Firefox releases a report, and it's definitely been dipping, but that dip might be accounted for by a switch to other browsers (based on its percent of market share).

I'd be curious if you had any good sources for this, because my searches are mostly yielding crappy listicle blogs.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

I don’t have numbers that would directly address that. However, there are lots of statistics on the number of mobile users vs desktop users when it comes to the traffic in general. This trend has been clearly visible for about 15 years now.

Here’s something I found on a short notice. link

[–] davel@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What? They’re not going to kill their own browser that they virtually exclusively control. Why would they kill one of their biggest cash cows? Google is an ad company, and they want control of the client software that we use which they pump ads to and exfiltrate our identities from.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Whoosh

I think they were talking about Chrome becoming obsolete. Unlikely but not impossible

[–] infinitevalence@discuss.online 31 points 1 month ago

I moved back to Firefox a few years ago on desktop and mobile. It's perfectly fine and seems less laggy that Chrome.

[–] MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago

b-b-b-but brave will still pay me brace bux if i watch their ads right???

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago

Yeah we’ve known this was coming ever since Manifest V3 was a done deal. We’ve had years of foreshadowing and months of warning to get off Chromium.

[–] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Vivaldi is including its own adblock outside of the manifest system that uses many of the same blocklists that uBlock does (although at this point you have to add them manually) and hopes to get near the same functionality by the time it is pulled and Mv3 is implemented. They originally had plans to offer a Mv2 compliant area but after seeing how Mv3 was going to be implemented, they changed there plans to many users dismay.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think many people use Vivaldi. Also it is mostly proprietary so that's a hard pass for me.

[–] theorangeninja@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Roughly 92% of the browser’s code is open source coming from Chromium, 3% is open source coming from us, which leaves only 5% for our UI closed-source code.

https://vivaldi.com/blog/technology/why-isnt-vivaldi-browser-open-source/

Only the UI part is not open source.

[–] tubbadu@lemmy.kde.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's the point of keeping part of the UI closed source?

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

I've seen their reasoning, but I don't agree with it. The biggest counterexample to their concerns are other browsers: Firefox is no trouble maintaining its IP, and Brave is fully open source yet has not been formed once AFAIK.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've scene posts about Firefox enterprise from a business perspective. I wonder if we will see Firefox suddenly show up more in the business world. Ublock origin can save you from phishing links and malwarertizing

[–] moe90@feddit.nl 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My company allow the usage of Firefox, Chrome and Edge and these browsers are mandatory installed on our corporate computers. But, our users just pick the Chrome and Edge.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

You got to force it then

Be the shitty admin you want to see

[–] limitsomething@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Firefox exists and that's enough

[–] terusgormand8465@lemmings.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, agreed

[–] tubbadu@lemmy.kde.social 3 points 1 month ago

Total ignorant question: how hard would it be to fork (and mostly maintain) chromium keeping manifest V2 support?