19
submitted 3 weeks ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/firefox@fedia.io
16
submitted 1 month ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/firefox@fedia.io

An update on Mozilla's PPA experiment and how it protects user privacy while testing cutting edge technologies to improve the open web.

[-] yoasif@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

You can grab a profile of performance issues and report them: https://profiler.firefox.com/docs/#/./guide-profiling-firefox-android

88
submitted 1 month ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/firefox@fedia.io

I look left and right, and I'm the only one who…

32
submitted 1 month ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/firefox@fedia.io

TL;DR: Firefox used to have a great extension mechanism based on the XUL and XPCOM. This mechanism served us well for a long time. However, it came at an ever-growing cost in terms of maintenance for both Firefox developers and add-on developers. On one side, this growing cost progressively killed any effort to make Firefox secure, fast or to try new things. On the other side, this growing cost progressively killed the community of add-on developers. Eventually, after spending years trying to protect this old add-on mechanism, Mozilla made the hard choice of removing this extension mechanism and replacing this with the less powerful but much more maintainable WebExtensions API. Thanks to this choice, Firefox developers can once again make the necessary changes to improve security, stability or speed. During the past few days, I’ve been chatting with Firefox users, trying to separate fact from rumor regarding the consequences of the August 2020 Mozilla layoffs. One of the topics that came back a few times was the removal of XUL-based add-ons during the move to Firefox Quantum. I was very surprised to see that, years after it happened, some community members still felt hurt by this choice. And then, as someone pointed out on reddit, I realized that we still haven’t taken the time to explain in-depth why we had no choice but to remove XUL-based add-ons. So, if you’re ready for a dive into some of the internals of add-ons and Gecko, I’d like to take this opportunity to try and give you a bit more detail.

102
submitted 3 months ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

Mozilla did their biggest Reddit AMA yet on Thursday, June 13, with eight members of the Firefox leadership team. With 400 total comments on the post, they c...

72
submitted 3 months ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/firefox@fedia.io

Mozilla did their biggest Reddit AMA yet on Thursday, June 13, with eight members of the Firefox leadership team. With 400 total comments on the post, they c...

25
submitted 3 months ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/firefox@fedia.io
40
submitted 4 months ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/firefox@fedia.io

Firefox 130 will feature an on-device AI model that automatically generates alt-text for images, integrated into its built-in PDF editor.

59
submitted 4 months ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/firefox@fedia.io
13
submitted 5 months ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/firefox@fedia.io

Hello, SUMO community! We're setting the stage for something big: a revamp of our style guide designed to make our support content not just user-friendly, but user-delightful. To get a ...

21
submitted 6 months ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/firefox@fedia.io

Today’s Speedometer release is more open and challenging than before and is the best tool for driving browser performance improvements.

20
submitted 7 months ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/firefox@fedia.io

Today marks a significant moment in our journey, and I am thrilled to share some important news with you. After much thoughtful consideration, I have decid

[-] yoasif@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago
[-] yoasif@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago

We don't recommend pre-built user.js files contributed by the community.

You can always look at my guide if you like, I suppose.

[-] yoasif@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Question: Most of resources I've found online lead me to believe that all I need is to modify browser.low_commit_space_threshold_mb. But it's nowhere to be found. about:config on MacOS is just returning an empty value and offers me to set it. Dare I? Would it actually work?

You can always remove the edit if it breaks things catastrophically. Why not try it and see?

https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/xpcom/base/AvailableMemoryWatcherMac.cpp leads me to believe that this functionality should work if you can trigger it.

I currently have a puny 380 tabs open that consume 42GB RAM on my MBP '21 Max whatever (with 64GB total, shared with the GPU).

This seems like the bigger problem.

If Firefox is using an unexpected amount of RAM, report a bug by following the steps below:

  1. Open about:memory in a new tab.
  2. Click Measure and save...
  3. Attach the memory report to a new bug
  4. Paste your about:support info (Click Copy text to clipboard) to your bug.

If you are experiencing a bug, the best way to ensure that something can be done about your bug is to report it in Bugzilla. This might seem a little bit intimidating for somebody who is new to bug reporting, but Mozillians are really nice!

If you prefer not to open a bug, you can instead reduce the number of content processes used by Firefox to a lower amount by going to about:config and changing dom.ipc.processCount.webIsolated to a lower number.

[-] yoasif@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago
[-] yoasif@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago

changes the Ctrl+Shift+T keyboard shortcut to reopen the last closed tab or last closed window in the order they were closed or restore the previous session if there aren’t any tabs or windows to reopen.

Amusing that Firefox gets worse to match Chrome here. Oh well.

[-] yoasif@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago

Do you see any crash report ids in about:crashes?

[-] yoasif@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago

You probably want to ask Google about that. You can modify the page using extensions like uBlock Origin as well.

[-] yoasif@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago

Reddit wasn't that good.

[-] yoasif@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago
view more: next ›

yoasif

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF