New rule on link Aggregators/Forwarders: (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by jordanlund@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

89 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We've had some trouble recently with posts from aggregator links like Google Amp, MSN, and Yahoo.

We're now requiring links go to the OG source, and not a conduit.

In an example like this, it can give the wrong attribution to the MBFC bot, and can give a more or less reliable rating than the original source, but it also makes it harder to run down duplicates.

So anything not linked to the original source, but is stuck on Google Amp, MSN, Yahoo, etc. will be removed.

(page 2) 39 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago

As someone who raised this issue, I want to thank the mods for addressing this. The MBFC bot aside, I think this will also cut down on dupes, as I’ve seen numerous times where an article was shared twice- once from the OG source and then another version from MSN or Yahoo news.

And for users who want to check the source of something, it does make it easier to fact check for yourself.

Who knows, it might even slow down certain profligate posters who obviously just take every link in a news aggregator and share it (and then brush off every comment with a “I didn’t write the article…) 😉

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 week ago

Accounts have been spamming MSN, amp and yahoo links?

[-] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

Yes, mostly MSN and Yahoo

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

People usually link to sites like MSN and Yahoo because the content is no longer locked behind a paywall. 🤷‍♂️

[-] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Many of the articles I’ve seen are not in fact behind a paywall but obviously YMMV

load more comments (5 replies)

[-] OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Can we please just get rid of the propaganda bot instead? It's bad at what it claims to do, and does nothing to stem the flow of disinformation here.

If you really want users to think about their sources, then you should have a dedicated source discussion thread for every post.

The bot actively and objectively makes Lemmy a worse platform. I've personally stopped recommending Lemmy to friends, and the bot is the top reason. (The other reason is the power users who astroturf the various news communities with their pet issues. Hopefully that will change after the election.)

[-] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

So the reason you don’t recommend Lemmy is a bot that you can block if you don’t like it? That seems a little much, IMO

load more comments (9 replies)

[-] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 week ago

For a second I thought you were talking about our favorite high-traffic poster, who is now queue flooding 15 articles a day.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

A dedicated source discussion thread for every post would have to be automated and, ideally, link to a source that checks the bias and credibility of the source...

You just suggested what we're already doing...

[-] OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

People can link their own sources. There could be a dedicated community to keep track. Literally anything is better than the half-assed bot telling everyone what to think.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Please provide an OG source for this.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

https://youtu.be/xHCald8004k

[-] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Stop it, I really mean it!

[-] teft@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Anybody want a peanut?

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Rest well, and dream of large women.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

While you're at it, why don't you give me a nice paper cut and pour lemon juice on it?

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

load more comments

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024

99 points (92.3% liked)

politics

19043 readers

3778 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News