190
Well the good news is being inside it's really easy. You can be inside a sleeping bag for example.
"An act of compassion on our part because you all deserve to be murdered on sight"
-normal folks with no issues
Nah, it's about further wealth transfer to the prison industrial complex. Dead people can't be sold as slaves to farmers.
Squirrels are granted more freedom and dignity than humans in Florida
Sooo. Can we bus them all to DeSantis’ back yard? That’s what one does in these situations, right?
"The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread."
Anatole France
Can you please link to the actual articles instead of using the Google redirect?
https://www.cbsnews.com/miami/news/new-florida-law-bans-homeless-from-sleeping-outdoors/
Lemmy allowing you to edit any part of your post is just so good.
We don't like your existence, so we're criminalizing it.
Need more slaves for the prison-industrial complex.
Party at DeSantis's mansion!
So I guess we'll just die then¯\_(ツ)_/¯
That's the intended effect here.
Die or leave, either way they can pretend the problem's been solved
leave to go where?
Would be nice to see them all organize and descend on Washington, a tent city wave vis a vis the Bonus March in 1932.
I wonder how bad homeless would need to get before major reform. Camps are going to keep popping up until they overwhelm local resources, and then disperse some, a microcosmic cycle of ruralization and urbanization, with greater and greater capacity, and more and more sophisticated systems of public services, trade, and justice, until institutions and policy are replaced by popular demand.
What's more, increasing poverty and homelessness is a major social, economic, public wellness, and national security issue that, in addition to not going away anytime soon, is something I think most Americans find compassion for, and even demand action on, when it's face to face, people like themselves.
It's like, as the oceanliner sinks, and the 99% have to fight for a few life boats and a piece of door, while the 1% fly away on a helicopter, the 99% must realize they were exponentially closer to being in the same boat together than any of them were to being on the helicopter.
homeless people would have a hard time organizing I think. from what I understand they are spending the day trying to make money and eat. this will affect where they choose to live and how far they'll travel.
Someone else’s problem according to them. The NIMBYs can’t be bothered to think about it.
I hear sometimes there's buses to Martha's vineyard
interesting 🤔
Jokes aside, I'm talking about this monstrous stunt from DeSantis from a few years ago:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha%27s_Vineyard_migrant_airlift
Apparently it wasn't a bus, my bad.
As a meta aside - please don't use amp links.
Remember that movie where in the future all restaurants were Taco Bell? Well the real future, all public services are police.
I think that was demolition man, where only taco bell survived the franchise wars
Even worse: the police are sponsored by/a subsidiary of Taco Bell
Now you too can be beaten down with a delicious Chulupa Supreme^tm^
Wielded by Chalupa Batman.
And be ruthlessly yapped at by tiny dog with a party hat.
So now they have to sleep indoors. Then they are not homeless anymore. Problem solved!
this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
190 points (95.2% liked)
politics
18966 readers
3087 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS