220

Alan Miller shook and trembled on gurney after becoming second person to be executed by controversial technique

Alabama has carried out the second execution in the US using the controversial method of nitrogen gas, an experimental technique for humans that veterinarians have deemed unacceptable in the US and Europe for the euthanasia of most animals.

Alan Eugene Miller, 59, was pronounced dead on Thursday evening at a south Alabama prison. The lethal method involves being strapped to a gurney, where a respirator mask is applied to the face and pure nitrogen piped in. The resulting oxygen deprivation will cause death by asphyxia.

Miller shook and trembled on the gurney for about two minutes with his body at times pulling against the restraints, followed by about six minutes of gasping breathing, according to the Associated Press.

Miller’s death is the latest in an extraordinary week in the US in which five condemned men in five states are set to be killed over six days. Three prisoners have already been executed – on Friday South Carolina killed Khalil Divine Black Sun Allah in its first execution in 13 years, then on Tuesday Texas killed Travis Mullis and Missouri put to death Marcellus Williams.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

"Pro life"....

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

There's lots of people arguing that you require a cooperative person. But you could just put the person to sleep with an injection first, then strap them to the gurney, then slide them into a tank and just pump stuff in and stuff out. I think it's the cruelty that keeps it cruel. Those people in charge are as heartless as the cop waiting by the 20mph sign next to the school that happens to have been placed next to the freeway entrance.17mph, you're good, 21mph... are you white? If not you're getting a ticket. It's best done right in front of your own kids. Cruelty is what it is all about.

How do you put them to sleep first though?

This guy had survived a lethal injection because they couldn't find a vein.

[-] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 23 hours ago

The problem with that is, no anesthesiologist will work on an execution (something about "do no harm"), and properly sedating someone without one is more difficult than it appears to be.

[-] SacralPlexus@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

Probably not that hard if you don’t care if the patient survives.

¯\(ツ)

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 104 points 1 day ago

So he went through eight minutes at least of pain and panic? Sure sounds like cruel and unusual punishment to me. Although the idea that Alabama killed a man using a method considered too brutal to kill animals with does seem fitting.

[-] bastion@feddit.nl 43 points 1 day ago

No. With the notable exception of rodents, animals generally can't detect oxygen deficiency directly (though they may get loopy).

Nitrogen asphyxiation basically makes you loopy, then unconscious, then dead. It's experientially equivalent to exposure to normal air at extremely high altitudes. Military pilots are often exposed to this (in a controlled manner) precisely because it's so hard to recognize, and doesn't induce fear. Like, epic levels of hard to recognize, as in "Hey Bob, it's time to put your mask back on to keep you from dying!" Bob: snickers and clearly thinks this is a great joke, until the person straps his mask back on, and he realizes how serious the situation is

You can make a trough for a (non-starved) pig that constantly releases nitrogen gas (which it breathes as it's eating). The pig puts his head in the trough to eat, then passes out from lack of oxygen (this pulling it's snout out of the trough), then is like "what was I doing? Oh look, food.." ..and goes right back to it, passing out again.

This is completely different from the reaction to carbon dioxide asphyxiation, which the body has sensors for, and induces all kinds of panic. Try the same trough experiment with a pig using carbon dioxide, and it will stay the fuck away from the evil trough of death.

Nitrogen asphyxiation may not be unpleasant, but being executed certainly causes duress.

If the method of execution takes 8 minutes, and makes you "loopy" during that time, while contemplating your impending death, then that's cruel in my opinion.

In my opinion, if you're going to execute someone then brevity and certainty must surely be required to make it humane.

Imagine them hanging you upside down trying to find a vein for legal injection and being unable to do so for 2 hours. A firing squad would be better in many ways.

[-] Mac@mander.xyz 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You can watch Destin from Smarter Every Day almost die on camera* due to hypoxia.
I'll go looking for the link.

Obviously watch the whole video but start at 5:27 (ends around 7:30) for the moment. Watching this freaks me the fuck out every time.
YT Link

*He was in a safe environment

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Also so many instances of cave divers going loopy then dead in a matter of minutes. It's astounding that it's so easy to accidentally die from nitrogen but we just can't seem to get the hang of not torturing people to death.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] natecox@programming.dev 18 points 1 day ago

Multiple reports from observers of this execution method: it’s horrible, they thrash around on the gurney and seem to suffer greatly

This guy: nuh uh.

[-] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago

They're not doing it correctly. The person needs to be cooperative and able to follow instructions, and they need to be using a specific type of mask that vents their breath with the carbon dioxide out.

[-] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 23 hours ago

Yeah, I'm pretty sure most people aren't going to cooperate in their own execution.

This isn't like assisted suicide/euthanasia. These are, by definition, people being forced into this by the state. At least some portion of them are always going to be uncooperative.

[-] bastion@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah. The suicide pods are a good example. There's enough space in them that the person won't experience CO2 buildup in the short amount of time it takes.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, and they need to violate every human instinct and cooperate. They know this gas is there with the specific purpose to kill them against their will, it’s incredibly difficult to voluntarily breathe in that situation

[-] bastion@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago

No, they don't need to cooperate. If you struggle and thrash, no matter how you die, you'll endure the struggle and thrashing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Yeah, good luck getting someone to be cooperative and calmly following instructions while being murdered by the government in front of an audience 🙄

[-] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

Precisely. Wonderful if you've got highly painful terminal cancer though!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

They enjoy murdering people.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

The way they are doing it is horrifying.

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They're not doing it correctly to be used as euthenasia. You need:

a) a person without COPD, chronic bronchitis, or any other disorder that has swapped their drive to breathe away from increased blood carbon dioxide / acidity and towards oxygen deficiency (fun fact, oxygen deficiency isn't what drives most people to breathe).

b) a cooperative person who can follow instructions to breathe out fully then take 2-3 full deep breaths

c) a nonrebreather mask which is a special mask with an outlet valve so that when they breathe out that air with all the carbon dioxide is vented while the nitrogen continues being pumped in. (Edit: This is if they're alone in a room or somewhere with excellent ventilation, or the nitrogen would be vented as well after a certain point and could harm the observers, that's why the sarcopod is a pod).

Sounds like they're fine on A, but not doing B or C.

[-] Asifall@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

So does B make this basically a non-starter? Seems like you’re never going to get someone to cooperate with this (not that I blame them).

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yep. It’s fine for euthanasia but humane execution is impossible because of the extreme drive to survive in humans.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

So the problem being they're probably holding their breath which keeps the c02 in which causes the panic and fighting.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I’d argue the panic begins with the whole being strapped down to die against their will thing

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

Yes, but if they did that, the prisoner wouldn't suffer!

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Yes, if the prisoner would just calmly participate in being murdered, everyone would be much more comfortable!

[-] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

They were trying to do it cheaply.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

No, the cruelty is the point, as per standard procedure. The people who do this sort of shit enjoy killing people and the fucked up US "justice" system lets them do it legally.

[-] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 4 points 20 hours ago

It could also be both, using one as the excuse for the other.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
220 points (97.8% liked)

News

22948 readers
3701 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS