201
I've lost count, but I think Adam's has 5 separate investigations into his activities.
There’s a long list alright. The one that pissed me off the most was when he reappropriated library funds to build a cop city.
Completely out of the loop on this one... Do we think he's corrupt or that corrupt people are pushing him out because he's not corrupt?
He staffed his administration with a bunch of cronies and they've been up to various extortion and pay for play schemes. I'm unaware of he himself has gotten directly caught up in anything.
I'm unaware of he himself has gotten directly caught up in anything.
Does it even matter at this point? He's clearly a terrible judge of character and can't be trusted to find good people to run the city.
Once a cop…
This indictment is about him knowingly and illegally taking campaign funds from foreign countries. He's up to something already.
He may also be involved in the "buy favors from city hall" scheme most of his direct reports were engaged in, but that is still unknown.
He's an ex-cop, right?
Pretty sure he is a retired police captain
I mean innocent until proven guilty and such, but this guy has always been a dope and should never have been elected. I still think Katherine Garcia would have been a better pick.
It’ll be interesting to see what clown the GOP runs against him this time. They could possibly have a decent chance (remember, NYC GOP is generally much more moderate than national level) but it’ll inevitably be some idiot who’s never done anything.
I wonder if he gets a primary challenger.
Also, if NYC were a country, it would be ranked 13th in GDP globally and THESE are the people we get to choose from to run it.
No, let the clown show ride. It’s too entertaining. But she’s probably right.
this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
201 points (98.1% liked)
politics
18930 readers
3134 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS