1196
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago

If you're pulled over for using an iPad while you're driving you'll get a ticket. But if you build the iPad into the car it's somehow okay.

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

Nah, see, when you turn on the car's iPad, it shows a pop-up telling you not to use it while driving, so it's totally different.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 days ago

love how looking at phone screens is (rightfully) considered bad while driving, but then they just put a big fucking tablet on cars.

[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

I hate how they don't give you a choice in the matter.. Just give me basic controls, then sell a bespoke android tablet that mounts in the car. I thought car companies love to push extras?

[-] taladar@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

But if it just mounts in the car they can't tell you that you will need a new car because your built-in tablet doesn't get updates anymore.

[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Except they could be pushing a new tablet every few years. Like you need this tablet to unlock full self driving

load more comments (1 replies)

No no no, they only push "extras" that are already included in the car so they can charge more for doing nothing. This requires doing something.

[-] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago

Why not have both

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My major problems with this design trend, in my own (biased) experience:

  • Center console entertainment UI is usually the slowest thing ever made, making it an even bigger distraction than needed. I could develop muscle memory for blindly pushing the right virtual buttons, but the slowness makes this impossible. It's usually wildly under-specced, but what's stranger is that there's never an upgrade option you can buy from the manufacturer.

  • Can't use the panel blindly, creating a big honkin' distraction within reach of the driver. Speed (see above), iffy capacitive touch with no haptic feedback, as well as multiplexing the UI through deep menus, are the chief culprits here. If there were standard controls that were always on screen in the same place, with a suitably responsive UI, this wouldn't be as big a problem.

  • For systems that are fully-integrated, it's all or nothing. If the panel/CPU dies, you lose your stereo, navigation, and climate controls all at the same time. My car, fortunately, has the A/C physical controls. This creates a distinct point of failure which is nice - I'm pretty sure I will still have A/C if the panel craps out.

  • It's dirt cheap to manufacture and I think we all know it. We're already paying historically high prices for cars, and cheaping-out on the bits we touch the most is just an extra kick to the junk at this point. To the manufacturers: we have remarkably better experiences on our freaking phones every day, so nobody but your grandma is impressed with the weak-sauce, crippled, bogus UX you bolt into your expensive vehicles. You're not making cars cooler, you're just making car ownership worse. Do better.
[-] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

Reject smart cars because they're collecting your data and it will be used to increase your insurance rates.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 21 hours ago
  1. Only if you drive in a way they can call unsafe
  2. There is one brand that will let you opt out of tracking, storing data, etc: Tesla.
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The crazy thing for me is that apart from physical buttons, if car manufacturers actually just released models of 20-30 years ago as new launches, complete exterior and interior, they’d so well!

Edit - with just Bluetooth added but I’m cool with using a cassette adaptor of some sort. Also assuming the engines would be up to today’s emission standards. I mean just the shape and looks.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yup, just give me fuel efficiency upgrades and I'm happy. I don't need anything fancy, I'm even happy to have roll windows.

[-] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

1989 Honda acty pickup 🙏🙏

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago

My AC doesn't need an OTA patch.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlareShard@lemmy.world 152 points 3 days ago

Having a touchscreen to operate your car with is a safety hazard compared to having buttons and knobs.

[-] brap@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago

My Mazda had a nice combination of touch screen which disabled itself when the vehicle was in motion and you could then use the rotary control instead. Was really nice and intuitive with entirely separate AC, heated seats etc controls.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 47 points 2 days ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] BReel@lemmy.one 12 points 2 days ago

Leave me a phone sized screen for CarPlay and everything else can go back. I agree with the giant touch screen only stuff being nonsense, but CarPlay is life changing to my driving experience.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Montagge@lemmy.zip 87 points 3 days ago

What cooks my god damn goose isn't the stupid screen I'm going to break one day. It's that they run buses for other systems through the radio so you can't replace it with what you want.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 59 points 3 days ago

Yep, infotainment and HVAC should have different control systems entirely. If your radio dies it should not mean the death of your car completely. And I consider not having access to your government mandated cameras and defrosters a dead vehicle.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

You might die on a hill if you attempt to control a car using a touchscreen.

[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 25 points 2 days ago

Being able to feel controls instead of having to look at them while driving is key, but some of you take this to Luddite levels.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago

I can press any button I like on the console without looking, while knowing what button is.

I will never prefer anything else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago

I'm really thankful that Audi rolled back whatever they were doing and gave me knobs and switched to deal with. Like in fucking planes and space shuttles !

And fingers crossed all this common sense gets enshrined in law soonish.

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 2 days ago

I want 3 things in a car navmod:

  1. Decent enough sized screen for Android auto to show me the map. My 2018 Nissan leaf is probably the smallest I'd go on this, but I wouldn't even double it

  2. For the love of GOD could we let me upgrade the unit, or force android auto to use my powerful-enough-for-this-purpose phone handle rendering the video feed? My pixel can handle an external monitor at 1440p no problem, I'd love to give the shitty PC in my car a break from scrolling maps at 3fps

  3. Physical buttons for everything HVAC, can honestly take or leave the volume and tuner knobs as long as they're put on the steering wheel

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] abbadon420@lemm.ee 56 points 3 days ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] fubarx@lemmy.ml 45 points 2 days ago

Can we add 'cars with spare tires' to the list?

Having to call a damned tow-truck just to get a flat tire fixed is not a winning move if you're trying to sell how much your car benefits the environment.

[-] problematicPanther@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

Wait, new cars don't have spare tires? Wtf has the world come to?

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'd like to keep the Reverse Cam alongside the knobs personally.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago
[-] JameUwU@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

I dont think that pioneer controls the ac I'm gonna be honest w u

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

It fuckin' better not! The radio should be a module, and the AC should be part of the car. If they're the same system, get it the fuck away from me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Is this what the new subscribe-to-drive cars look like inside? Just a straight up tablet where the music and heat controls are supposed to be?

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago

There's a middle ground. Give me a decent-sized [touch]screen for Android Auto with physical HVAC & media controls.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

This is my daily drive. I do wish it had Bluetooth tough. I did get an FM Bluetooth transmitter, but it didn't work that well.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

I barely like using my phonebat times, why the fuck would I want a tablet to control my car?

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago

Look at Bruce Wayne over here, tired of using his batphone.

[-] kerrypacker@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Phonebat. It's not a phone shaped like a bat it's a bat shaped like a phone. Looks like somebody threw their phone, but then it keeps going and you're like "must be a phonebat"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
1196 points (98.3% liked)

People Twitter

5021 readers
1250 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS