152
I demand trump write a full page ad in the NYT apologizing to America and the world for being such a douchebag racist asshole, and fucking everything up. And then proceed to jail.
He did that once before, when he demanded the death penalty for the Central Park Five, who were wrongfully convicted.
He is a racist piece of shit.
Judges that are going to recuse themselves do so before they take on the case. This is both a stalling tactic and a fundraising technique. He probably already has the fundraising emails ready to go decrying the rigged liberal judge that refuses to recuse.
Yup. These meritless motions are done just to make news headlines. Habba, one of Trump's lawyers, was previously fined $1,000,000 for filing frivolous motions for the purpose of political grandstanding.
Habba the jutt?
The very same.
I do have to say...I'm loving Lemmy just for the crowd. Normally on Reddit, I'd be sorting through a mass of racist shitheads defending their shithead leader for an article like this, but most people here are just having conversations, whether they agree with the position of the linked content or not.
It's nice.
Yeah on here you just have to avoid anything that says hexbear.
Now you done it
load more comments
(5 replies)
Looks like so far, only 4 racist shitheads have found your comment. Only here, they’re too cowardly to refute your point.
load more comments
(2 replies)
So um...bets on how detailed she goes in her "fuck no" statement? Think it's going to be simple like a sentence or just a "no" or something extended?
No in whatever the shortest way to say no in legalese is
No
Legalese needs more words, something like "motion denied" would work.
No.
It would be nice if they could respond in giphys or video clips. I suggest something like this:
The judge should say, "sure. As soon as Clarence Thomas starts recusing himself."
Oh, gawd, I'd love to see that.
As fun as that would be, it would achieve nothing good.
Somebody needs his diaper changed!
I imagine the ketchup cleaning crew has been stepped up a notch in the past year or so...
Trump demands a lot of things.
Lol Clarence Thomas first
Chutkan: Recuse myself? No, I don't think I will, thank you.
You have no power here! 😅
He’s in no position do demand anything from anyone. He should be begging for mercy.
This.
Oh course he is trying to make demands. Obviously it's damaging to his case so he wants the recusal.
".... cause when you're a star, they let you do it..."
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Former President Trump on Monday formally demanded the recusal of the federal judge overseeing his 2020 election subversion case in Washington, D.C.
“Although Judge Chutkan may genuinely intend to give President Trump a fair trial — and may believe that she can do so — her public statements unavoidably taint these proceedings, regardless of outcome.”
In October 2022, Chutkan chided Ohio Jan. 6 defendant Christine Priola during her sentencing that she and other rioters offered “blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day,” according to a hearing transcript.
Trump has publicly criticized Chutkan before, claiming she “obviously wants me behind bars,” and is “very biased and unfair.” He has also speculated that there is “no way” he will receive a fair trial under the federal judge and previewed he would file the recusal motion.
“Public statements of this sort create a perception of prejudgment incompatible with our justice system,” Trump’s attorneys wrote.
“In a case this widely watched, of such monumental significance, the public must have the utmost confidence that the Court will administer justice neutrally and dispassionately.
The original article contains 537 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
load more comments
(3 replies)
He can demand anything he wants. He's owed nothing.
Awww, keep stomping those little feet of yours, little prezzy. Who's a wittle insurrectionist? Oh that's right, you are. You are!
Someone give that baby a pacifier.
Demands? The criminal donnie Bid Laden is not in the position of demanding jack squat. He can fuck right off.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
152 points (91.8% liked)
politics
19096 readers
1159 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS