39

archived Link

Time to expand the House.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've had some fun getting people to explain to me why rural states should be over represented. They commit so hard to the idea of protecting the rural minority from more populous areas, then ask them why other minorities shouldn't be provided the same protection. Then they get mad.

[-] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I like that a lot. I think I'll use it next holiday get together.

[-] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One neat trick to ruin Thanksgiving!! Grandmothers hate it

For real, though, I try to avoid politics in the name of civility, but my dad can't resist sometimes, so this is a nice end-around. However, it doesn't really address the most likely retort, which is that (R)'s will simply claim that minorities are already overprotected.

Although, I suppose one silver lining to come out of the must recent spat of Supreme Court decisions is that those limited bits of progress that had been made to protect marginalized communities are being stripped away, so any claims that those communities are already protected are much easier to directly refute.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Oooo

That’s a great way to put it.

Yeah.

Stealing that.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure I like the idea of having three representatives from a district. I think that's a recipe to have the gerrymandered party have 3x power.

However, I am all for increasing the size of Congress. Double it! Then plan on adding some seats for every census.

Simply doubling the size of the House would reduce (but not eliminate!) The advantage smaller states have in the EC. And adding a few seats for every census could reduce the chance that a state has to give up a seat.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/0FyhTBvLu4w

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
39 points (93.3% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4432 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS