739
submitted 1 year ago by Oiconomia@feddit.de to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sol0WingPixy@ttrpg.network 120 points 1 year ago

Yeah like, I can understand a hesitation around being directly involved in a war effort, but mate once you’ve opened your system up to the military you’re kinda already there.

[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but Putin said he'd give me like $10 or whatever in rubles if I did it. Then he called me a chicken... And I'm no chicken and I wanted the $10 so I could get this month's battle pass!

[-] zik@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He literally was paid a shit-ton of money by the pentagon to provide service to the Ukranian military. He took the money. And then he's like, "how could I have known they'd use it in WAR?"

It's pretty obvious he got paid by the Russians to sabotage that operation. Which makes him an enemy agent against the US I guess since he sabotaged a military asset the US paid for.

He got paid to let Ukraine use starlink within Ukraines post 2014 borders to defend Ukraine land. Then when Ukraine tries to bomb a Russian navy fleet OUTSIDE OF UKRAINE'S BORDERS and it doesn't work everyone gets mad. I'm all for trashing Elon when it's due, and I trash him a lot, but he was literally playing by the established rules here.

Had he let the Ukrainians bomb the fleet, he would have directly went against the US militaries orders. I get we all want Russia to stop and whatnot, but (and I hate that I'm the one defending him and saying this) Elon didn't do wrong here. The missles were flying correctly in starlink air, they hit the border, then stopped working. Also, this happened last year.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Perhaps if we got rid of borders.

Edit: I guess people didn't see his username.

[-] Sol0WingPixy@ttrpg.network 8 points 1 year ago

I will note, while I find my namesake’s story interesting, I do quibble on the benefits of bombardment by multiple-reentry thermonuclear warheads.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

It's definitely a controversial subject. But there may be some benefits to v2, like me not needing to wake up for work lol

[-] ezures@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 year ago

So how does it feel to not have a country? To not have borders to define yourself against the world? (I guess seven nukes do make a clear border, huh?)

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I believe you have the wrong psychopath in an experimental plane.

[-] ezures@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 year ago

My bad, but its my duty to always reference it. (They mail me some fanta ever time I do it, which is wierd, i never gave them my address, and I'm afraid what will happen if i stop)

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Mmmmm orange

[-] downpunxx@kbin.social 104 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Starlink is fucking fantastic, it's Elon Musk who's a sloppy Nazi cunt

[-] gramathy@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 year ago

It does have some downsides (orbital clutter in particular) but conceptually I agree

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

Orbital pollution and atmosphere pollution from the launches. All to avoid laying some fiber :/

[-] Mobile_Audience@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

I’d be ecstatic if ISPs laid more fiber where I live. But I’d be even happier if they laid any sort of internet cables at all to the outskirts of towns. Back where my family used to live (smaller town) there were plenty of houses on the outskirts of town that don’t have any internet unless they pay out the nose for satellite. It’s literally not worth the ISP’s money to lay any sort of cable out that way since there isn’t enough customer density for the amount of cable they’d need to lay.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 year ago

The fun part is that the US tax payer already paid the ISPs to lay cable to those houses, but they just pocketed the money, didn't lay the cable, and faced no consequences.

[-] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago

Which is why it is the role of the government to handle that. Are there streets ? Why are there streets? They aren't worth it, right? So how come there are streets? Government can force ISP to lay the cables. "You want to lay any cable in that city? Then lay all of the cable in the region" easy

[-] Mobile_Audience@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

I wish. afaik in the USA, the major ISPs have been told by the government to expand internet coverage. Even got paid boatloads of money to do so. But the ISPs did jack diddly squat. So they got fined and that’s the end of the story as I know it.

[-] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

Well... are streets private or public? Are you water pipes private or public? Just a little idea for public policy

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] EulersBoiler@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It doesn't really clutter orbits as they will deorbit unpowered in less than a decade.

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago

the fact that there has to be a shitton of them is the clutter. Deorbiting them after their service life doesn't change the fact that at any one point there's a fuckton of satellites up there, messing up astronomy. And this is just the first of what will probably be several constellations.

[-] Relo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yes but see...

The users of starlink just pay for the costs Elon had to bring those satellites up there and keep them running.

The global costs aka total costs on society will be payed by us all.

[-] Tar_alcaran@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Ehhhhhh.

Starlink has a major problem in durability as a result of the low orbit (required for low latency), meaning it's extremely expensive in upkeep.

The satellites inability to talk to eachother, combined with the narrow transmission angle means the system scales very poorly and has numerous bottlenecks (both the satellite and the uplink station). Yes, Starlink is "working on it", but the laser-link solution is very complex in terms of engineering.

Starlink has some amazing usecases, but those usecases can't possible cover the cost. It runs almost entirely on subsidies and venture capital.

[-] Apollo@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

Sheeet, I never realised they can't talk to one another.

[-] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

Same, I thought that that's what they do. I guess it was another of those melon idea talks about the future.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

I think they were supposed to, kind of weird that they don't already do so given that to fix the issue all the satellites need to be relaunched.

[-] famousringo@sh.itjust.works 71 points 1 year ago

Using something I’ve built to destroy warships before they can launch cruise missiles at an apartment block?

Now I am become death, saviour of civilian power grids.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago
[-] Spudwart@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My le internet, it le networked interconnectively?

[-] pascal@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

What do you mean "my internet"?

Internet was purposely developed for military goals.

[-] Sapphy@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Elon-Meme 😅

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
739 points (94.3% liked)

Memes

45535 readers
397 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS