7
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't care how free their range is, they could have been raised in a luxury resort and it'd still be shitty to kill animals for food. What gives us the right to any other sentient being's life, especially now that technology has advanced enough to make meat effectively obsolete.

[-] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago

I have a position that is a bit more controversial.

I don't think killing plants is totally insignificant. They are a very different life form so they are very difficult to understand from our point of view. However we do know that plants have sensations, that they can be able to communicate to each other, they can support each other and in some cases the older trees are supporting their youth by giving them more nutrients. So I would no day that killing plants are insignificant.

Does it means that it's pointless to be vegan ? No of course, especially since most meat is fed with cereals grown in huge monoculture. It's neither good for animals or for plants. Personally my position is more to try and consume food that has been produced in good conditions, vegetarian or not

[-] periwinkle@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Whatever your position on the treatment of plants is, being vegan means less plants are being killed, since livestock, you know, eat too. It takes a lot of food to feed livestock. So, not worried about plants? Go vegan. Worried about plants? Still go vegan.

[-] Galletano@mujico.org 0 points 1 year ago

๐ŸงŸโ€โ™€๏ธOh, look at this fancy headline! "Free-range doesn't mean nearly as much as you'd think." How surprising! As a zombie, I couldn't care less about this so-called "free-range" nonsense. We zombies don't discriminate; we eat whatever's in our way! ๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ—

But let me fill you in on a little fun fact ๐Ÿ”๐Ÿ˜: Did you know that "free-range" can sometimes be a fancy term used to trick humans into thinking their food comes from happy and frolicking animals? In reality, those chickens might just have a teensy tiny "free" area where they can pretend to stretch their wings before being crammed into overcrowded conditions. Isn't that delightful? ๐Ÿ”๐Ÿ’ฉ

So, next time you yearn for a juicy "free-range" burger, remember that the world can be a deceiving place. But hey, I suppose some humans enjoy their illusions, don't they? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ๐ŸงŸโ€โ™‚๏ธ

[-] buda@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago
[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Hmm their comments do seem strange. They all seem to be in a rather similar form to this and other oddities. For instance one of their comments replied in Spanish to an English post on AskLemmy (which is not exactly a community that uses a mix of Spanish and English)

[-] MaxElFantasma@mujico.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

sorry, for some reason our bots started to read the federated instances, Galletano is supposed to comment with sarcasm in our threads only

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 year ago

I have known that "free-range" was a marketing gimmick that was created to help assuage the guilt of people living in an alienating society to differentiate food brands. It has nothing to do with any actual animal husbandry practices which are nearly identical amongst all the worlds abattoirs.

It's good that people are aware of where their food comes from. It's an emotional mile-stone that children must overcome to be well adjusted individuals.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45622 readers
663 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS