this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
140 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

34895 readers
248 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Microsoft and antitrust name a more frequent teamup

Yup. It's about time MS got some antitrust push back they've been getting relentless lately...

Edge is well into enshittification territory, it's gross to use. But the real monopoly practice is bing-ifying everything. They're using their OS monopoly to claw out monopolies in browsers and therefore AI search.

If they preinstalled a Firefox wrapper like the EU browser choice ballot they used to have, this would all go away in a heartbeat!

I'm dreaming, I know...

[–] radarsat1@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Literally had a meeting with someone yesterday who, after starting late because of trouble logging in and things crashing, started off the meeting by apologizing for using Teams but said it was just easier because it's the default. Made me chuckle.

Anyone who chooses Teams because they actually think it's better.. I just.. are we even using the same program?

[–] that_one_guy@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It baffles me that companies the size of Microsoft can't nail UX. They have nigh-unlimited resources and just can't get software to work well in an environment that they themselves designed. I get that they will put the minimum amount of work into a product, so long as it's achieving it's goals, but companies this size have zero excuses for an app that doesn't work flawlessly.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago

Here's the thing - being bigger makes this much harder

Software is about vision - we learn methodologies and make all sorts of tools to enable collaboration, but one skilled and driven dev is always going to outperform a large team

It's a lot like painting murals. If you're making something big, you might want some helpers, but the painter is the guy with the vision, working on all the fine details. A few skilled people who have worked together for a long time might be able to do it together and you can make a design around the idea of collaboration, but generally you're going to get clashing styles

[–] Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the same scam they tried to pull with Internet Explorer. They got hit with an Anti-Trust for that, you'd think they'd learn their lesson.

[–] invalidname@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It’s just the cost of doing business for them, unfortunately.

[–] boo3@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

They should look how much they force edge on you too.

load more comments
view more: next ›