this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024

135 points (98.6% liked)

Canada

10804 readers

637 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 Sports

Hockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Toronto Blue Jays

Basketball

Toronto Raptors

Soccer

Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
Toronto FC

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

General:
- Canada Politics
- FairVote Canada
Federal Parties (alphabetical):
- Animal Protection Party of Canada
- NDP
By Province (alphabetical):
- BC Greens

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

135

The Netherlands generates way more solar power than Canada. Here's how they do it - Global investment in solar power now tops all other energy generation technologies combined, says IEA (www.cbc.ca)

submitted 2 years ago by LimpRimble@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

While Canada lags behind in solar adoption, many places including Germany, China, Japan and even the United States are moving quickly.

In fact, on certain days, some places are generating so much energy, the price to purchase it is dropping below zero, prompting concerns about storage capacity for the abundant power source.

all 35 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Poutinetown@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

I don't think it's fair to look at Canada as a monolith. Quebec is generating most of its energy from hydro, whereas Ontario relies on a well established nuclear energy infrastructure. Provinces that need to change are Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Alberta.

Edit: Manitoba actually relies on hydro for 97% of their usage. So correction: only Alberta and Saskatchewan!

[–] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago

https://www.cer-rec.gc.ca/en/data-analysis/energy-markets/provincial-territorial-energy-profiles/provincial-territorial-energy-profiles-manitoba.html

Mantioba's mostly fine, SK and AB are awful though

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

In Alberta you can't refuse to let someone exploit oil resources found on your property but you can't willingly let someone develop solar energy on your property.

Solar farms are financed by giant companies (with the biggest one being financed by Amazon) as a way to greenwash their emission numbers even though the electricity being produced isn't used to power their own infrastructure.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't think "our operations run on green energy" matters that much. Energy is energy, if you give other people green energy, you are still reducing emissions. You are just reducing other people's instead of your own, but global warming is a global issue.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago

It matters if it means companies don't actually do anything to improve their emissions and just finance production instead. All that solar energy could have been produced by a crown corporation so the state would reap the profits and it would have forced Amazon to actually improve.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

In Alberta you can’t refuse to let someone exploit oil resources found on your property

TBF, I'm pretty sure that's how it works throughout the country. The title on my home in Ontario has easements for potential minerals/resources as well.

[–] ray@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Manitoba doesn't belong on that list. Manitoba's electricity comes from 100% renewable sources (~97% hydro, ~3% wind, and 0% fossil fuels).

[–] Poutinetown@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah I forgot Manitoba was mostly relying on hydro!

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

And is exporting a percentage of that hydro to other jurisdictions as well.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Isn't Alberta just an oil interests runaway province that at this point is a damn near failed state? Every rule.coming out of that place is "how can we make it even better for our oil overlords"

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

They also have a lower cost of living, legalized sex work, lower crime rates including lower car theft rates and lower violent crime rates, and way better public transportation.

[+] sushimi@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What a load of nonsense.

[+] sushimi@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

most of it...

didn't/doesn't address housing shortage.

Not sure what to say about this. This is a failure of every level of government, some levels are more willing to try to address part of this while other levels are actively trying to make it worse. To me this statement feels like it comes from someone who is frustrated but hasn't taken the time to understand the problem that they are frustrated with.

didn't/doesn't address inflation.

Inflation is being dealt with... Things are nearly back to normal levels of inflation. You can't say that it's not being addressed.

increases taxation as a means to get more income flow to the government

This is normal and a good thing? I'm also not sure which taxes you're referring to? Our taxes haven't really changed much recently.

spends crazy(milions and bilions) on S.D.G ideals

Unless you have meaningful examples there isn't anything I can say here.

makes it impossible for farmers to meet (Co2 etc)regulations

and government buys them out..

and Schiphol etc buying that land for extra CO2 credit.

Once again I need some sources on this, this sounds like something you heard and are repeating without taking the time to understand what was being talked about and now you're trying to pass it off as fact.

has crazy 'sustainability' demains, which makes international production business move elsewhere

Not sure what you're talking about here. Is this referring to businesses "offshoring" the production of goods? This has been happening for a long time and I hope that we can start bring more manufacturing back "onshore"

increasing poverty. People requiring food-bank support is increasing, but because of increasingly harsh business environment the food-bank actually obtains less from industrie.

Yes poverty is up, but not for the reasons you're suggesting(unless you have some new data I haven't seen). food inflation is going to be the new norm until the world gets the climate crisis under control. Our global agriculture system is not built to handle the rapidly changing climate we've created. droughts, floods and war are likely going to continue to cause price instability.

many small/medium businesses are going bust because they can't repay the corona-loan. (which many have warned is a slow death trap)

This is also normal? Many economists believe that economic downswings every 7-15 years is good for an economy because it helps wipe out under preforming businesses. if a company took out 60k in loans, and after 4 years hasn't been able to pay back the 40k they owe (20k was already forgiving), and also can't find a bank to move that loan to, they are likely not running a very good business.

I'm glad that we gave these businesses a lifeline during covid, but at some point they need to prove that they can adapt to the new market conditions. No one forced them to take these loans...

So ya, to me most of this was a mix of unsubstantiated opinion and vague concepts, which I feel is acceptable to call nonsense

[–] CeeBee@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

However, unless Germany, Canada has a stellar nuclear energy industry.

Our CANDU reactors are amongst the best and the safest in the world.

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Germany has been dismantling nuclear power plants.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

And building liquified natural gas terminals to receive shipments in the US after getting caught with their pants down by Putin. I’m pretty sure Putin’s propaganda machine had a lot to do with Germany’s pullback from nuclear.

[–] CeeBee@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I meant to say "unlike Germany". I'll fix it

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 years ago

So what? It isn't as though solar is the only clean energy option out there (and the externalities from the production and disposal of solar panels make it not as environmentally friendly as it looks at first glance, although obviously still better than fossil fuels). Wind, hydro, nuclear, and even tidal may be more appropriate for our much larger, much colder, much less dense, more northerly country. We already have a lot of hydro and (in Ontario) a lot of nuclear, and both seem to serve our needs well.

What we really need to do is shift Alberta's economy away from fossil fuels. That would do a lot more good than a Netherlands-sized installation of solar panels.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I haven't read the article but.... :)

Generally the big problem we still have to solve with reviewables is storage.

I think that one advantage that the NL has with renewables is that they don't have the storage problem, because they can always reroute to more pumping water out the polders.