That page is the absolute purist distillation of brainworm essential oil I have ever seen. What in the entire actual fuck?

How tf were socialist men feminized by gombulism?

Yeah hi, I'd like a large side of feminised men under communism please, youre menus very cluttered i only got that far, can you recommend anything else?

The bros (and the people who has to endure them) were all materially better during ebil gommunism, which made the bros gay, but it was also patriarcal, and made the wamen unhappy, despite wamen doing far better than after gommunism was killed.

So when the ebil patriarcal gommunism dieded, all the bros stopped being gay and emasculated, but also longed for patriarchy which was no more cuz gommunism ded, so they turned into reactionary dickheads and started posting on 4chan and jacking off to tradcath-gf-wojacks

Peak western intellectualism

Yeah, this kinda jargonic shit is pretty typical for your average liberal arts text. I'd love to read the studies they are citing, cause I will guarantee that there is a lot of editorializing going on here. Notice how the 'Men's coping... authoritarian communist rule' is completely uncited. The sections before and after are cited, but that part is stuck in there to make it look like it's supported, but I would make a safe bet that neither study actually says that because if they did, they would quote the study's author directly. Also notice how that trend continues through the page.

I had this kind of problem all the time when I did my liberal arts degree and my grade would suffer for it depending on the professor. Never enough to get a 'C', but I am legitimately getting better grades in my engineering classes now because I don't have to deal with this level of interpretative, editorialized and adhoc bullshit. Shit's tough, especially if you actually take the science seriously, unlike a lot of these authors.