this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
37 points (93.0% liked)

Technology

6823 readers
209 users here now

News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.

What doesn't fit here?

The core of the story has to be technology focused.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An intriguing prototype with a lot of rough edges.

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] devilish666@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

As long as it's not distracting & disturbing for the driver i support this, bc sometimes it's annoying to see infotainment system

[–] HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Absolutely. Having things like the fuel gauge & speedometer within my field of view as I'm driving means I don't have to look down / away from the road to check.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

HUDs are something I thought would be gimmicky but it’s actually really useful. Eg. for navigation it can show you where/when your next turn is without having to take your eyes off the road. It works really well in my experience.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Would I give up my car free lifestyle for windshield augmented reality that makes it look like I've got Mad Max as a crucified hood ornament? No, but it's an excellent try.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why bother with a HUD when there are already transparent screens?

https://youtu.be/zuw0Qr8DHuA

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Will those screens fail safe? If the hud fails it can be turned off and the windshield is unobstructed.

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

Seems like a much more expensive method compared to a simple projector. Also, a screen would still display a HUD. A HUD isn't a technology, it's just a means of displaying information.

[–] 108@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Some C level: what if we made it show ads for business physically around them?

[–] Daikusa@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I sorta do this at night with my phone

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago

Looks interesting, but it will probably need to be way brighter for daytime use.

Eye tracking is a no-go for anywhere with bright snow in the winter time where you need sunglasses, or in the summertime and need sunglasses.

I could see it being useful someday.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It’s notable that commercial jets have this sort of thing but it limited to a small panel that you can look around.