1148
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'd vote for her, but I don't think she's ready. Better than Biden though.

Personally, I want Jon Stewart. He's not perfect, but there's not a single person on the planet better equipped to take down Trump.

I don't know if Jon or AOC would make a better president, but Jon would be better at campaigning against Trump.

But really just give us someone under 65. (Note: I'll still vote for the good person who's too old for the job if the alternative isn't better.)

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

I definitely get the love for Stewart. However, he holds no elected position and has repeatedly stated that he has no interest in running for president. So I'm not going to be the one to hold a gun to his head and force him to run.

AOC has the proper ambitions. If she's not ready then let her decide that because the only reason she wouldn't be is because a bunch of out of touch old dudes refuse to mentor her and I'm not sure that's such a bad thing.

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 months ago

pls no more reality tv presidents.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

There's a bit of a difference. Jon Stewart has made his reputation and career in political commentary. That's not exactly The Apprentice.

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Yeah Jon is very intelligent, very quick witted, and a deep thinker. He reads a lot, listens, and learns from his mistakes. He knows to admit he doesn’t know something and listen to advice. And most importantly, he actually wants to do what’s right. I’m pretty sure he’d be a top 10 president.

To compare him to a reality tv personality like Trump is a little disingenuous.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

ps no more actors or presidents that want to get into acting

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

That's not fair, you don't always get to choose what you'll be successful at. But we could use a doctor president...

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I would literally pay hundreds of dollars to see Jon Stewart debate Trump, like pay per view. Jon would eviscerate Trump. He might frustrate him so much he’d have a heart attack right there on stage …. or better yet cause Trump to shit and completely overflow his diaper. Trump should probably wear his brown pants just in case.

[-] Freefall@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago
[-] Jarix@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Bet you if AOC said to Jon stewart ill run for president if you are my running mate he would do it.

That would be the best campaign in history

I would love AOC and bernie sanders to be on the supreme court, however impossible that is

[-] Freefall@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

He might just jump on that grenade because the US would need it and I'd give him better than even odds he would self-sacrifice to counter evil winning.

[-] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I also think he would do an actual good job as vice president. Like break the mould type good

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

We could draft him

[-] commandar@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Personally, I want Jon Stewart. He’s not perfect, but there’s not a single person on the planet better equipped to take down Trump.

Stewart would be terrible for it.

Smart guy, great at calling BS, but he's continued to preach understanding and cooperation in the post Trump world in a way that, plainly, isn't possible when the American right operates in pure bad faith at basically every turn.

Take all the issues Obama had getting walked all over because he tried to work with the GOP and amplify it.

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
1148 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4523 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS