1560
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 4 months ago

If you're going to do the thing with replacing Biden as the candidate, you couldn't get better than AOC, who will be 35 before November.

I personally think replacing Biden this late is a bad move even though I already think Biden sucks. But I grit my teeth and voted for the fucker just like I did with Clinton, because the alternative is literally insanity and fascism. I just don't realsitically seeing the party coalesce around anyone new at the last minute. Organizing Democrats is like herding cats, being a big tent party sucks noodles.

[-] ghostface@lemmy.world 52 points 4 months ago

Just keep repeating, Biden may not be the best, but his administration has been fantastic!

In comparison to the other party... Not just Biden you are voting for the administration. Supreme court justices Which affect everyday life!

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 4 months ago

Exactly this. So the party doesn't do what I would personally prefer. I still prefer whatever the fuck they're doing over outright fascism.

[-] Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

He knows how to delegate to people who are smarter than him. He also knows the importance of 'tone at the top' in getting the best out of his team. This is what makes him the better candidate.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I'd say it's been good, not great.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

This is when “meets expectations” looks great after so much bad behavior. It’s ok to appreciate something good.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Especially when it's dramatically better than the alternative.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 4 months ago

Biden exceeded my expectations. My expectations were low, but he did exceed them.

[-] balderdash9@lemmy.zip -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Good domestic policy. Bad foreign policy. Or have we all collectively forgot about the wars?

Edit: You all were very loudly criticizing Biden on Israel a few weeks ago, but fine, I guess Lemmy has moved on.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

have we all collectively forgot about the wars?

The wars that he didn't start? The wars that the aggressors are ignoring what Biden demands?

The ones where Trump is buddy-buddy with those ordering war crimes?

Those wars?

[-] balderdash9@lemmy.zip -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Israel in particular, yes. Before the debate everyone was criticizing Biden for continuing to financially support a genocide.

But I guess nobody cares about Palestine now.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 months ago

Bidens state department has been horrific, as well as his defense department.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 months ago

"this late"

Meanwhile, other countries' entire election season is like two months long total.

[-] balderdash9@lemmy.zip -2 points 4 months ago

Shhh, don't mention other countries. Nothing to see here, just keep listening to the establishment democrats telling us anything other than Biden is impossible. And then four years from now the fight for democracy will continue.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 months ago

I've seen this criticism of replacing Biden often recently "it's too late! We won't have time!"

Putting aside for the moment that it isn't late at all and complaints that it is feel like talking points, Biden IS old. The stats on someone his age dying that year are extremely high. There is a good chance he dies before the election.

If there isn't a plan to deal with that fairly likely possibility, then there isn't a plan to win.

Anyone in a position of power in the DNC making this claim is them confessing their own incompetence.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Hey man I've been dealing with the shitty outcomes of the politicians who lead this party being unwilling to listen to the public until well after the public has been proven right for my entire adult life.

I said Biden was too old in 2020. He's even too older now. The party didn't give a fuck and has spent their time hiding it and fucking us out of having primaries.

Who do you think will choose the new candidate? The same super delegates who gave us Hillary Clinton? It won't be a people's vote at the convention, it will be delegates, many of which are party apparatchiks.

Do you think the people who hid Biden's issues this late in the game will suddenly make a good choice? I don't. The party fucked us into this position and I do not think they are capable of unfucking us, sorry. Biden is who we have, alive or dead.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 months ago

"Party is bad. Might as well take what they give us" --Snot Flickerman

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Hey I'm not the one pretending that the same people who fucked this up can save us. That's you. I'm just accepting where we're at.

You gotta be naive if you think the party is going to hand the reigns to the people now after *checks notes... about thirty years of this shit.

But sure, have the party replace Biden with another fucking loser just like him, we'll see how that goes.

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

If they do replace him, it will just be with Kamala. The only thing up in the air would be who to appoint as her running mate.

IMO they should just do it ASAP. I honestly think Kamala would attract way more voters than Biden. She certainly has her issues but no worse than Biden's and she's way better on optics.

[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago

I fangirl for AOC but she ain't ready. Give her 4 more years at least.

[-] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

She's more ready than Trump is who was already "president."

That said, I would rather her be in Congress longer because she can be a voice longer. After 8 years of being president if elected, she wouldn't then want to become a senator or whatever. That would pretty much be it for her in politics outside of ex-president things... and she'd only be 43.

I'm also sure Kamala would be pissed if AOC were to get the nom instead of her. Not that that matters.

[-] blazera@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

everyone knows most voters only check on the candidates once every 7 months

[-] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago

Guess we'll have to wait and see. If Biden stays in and young people don't show up to vote, everyone will blame voters and not the DNC; even though the entire argument for Biden is his supposed electability.

We're in such dangerous waters right now that we might as well throw caution to the wind and try to get a woman elected POTUS. At least that would energize the base.

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Wow, that is exactly the opposite expectation and take from me. If young people don’t show up to vote, I expect they’ll blame the DNC instead of themselves, even though the purpose of voting is getting the best outcome for your future and not about liking people or being sold on a brand.

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
1560 points (99.0% liked)

News

23296 readers
928 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS