129

submitted 2 months ago by HeavenAndEarth@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

78 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 39 points 2 months ago

Russia is literally the only reason why countries like Cuba or DPRK are still standing

This is an overstatement. These places are standing because they literally fought and WON against the US. Give them the credit they deserve.

[-] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago

I don’t think it’s taking away from their revolutionary achievements to say that they would have been crushed without the Soviet Union!

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 21 points 2 months ago

But there's also a serious difference between those two things. USSR =/= Russia.

[-] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago

True, I interpreted op as referring to both the ussr and Russia. If they are exclusively referring to the last 30 years, yes they’re incorrect. Regardless they would have perished on their own

[-] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sure, but it is on the same level as claims that the USSR only defeated the Nazis because of the lend lease act. Material doesn’t fight on its own, and wars aren’t won without labor. You need both to be successful.