655
submitted 4 months ago by spicytuna62@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago

Yes. Should have started more 10years ago, but doesn't mean don't start now.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 months ago

If you start building a new nuclear plant today, it’ll start generating power around the year 2045, by which time renewables with storage will have gotten even cheaper.

Bet you the public will be on the hook to pay for that white elephant because utility companies privatize profits and socialize losses.

[-] someacnt_@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Why do you assume it takes that long? Are you assuming US circumstances?

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

That's how long they actually end up taking to build.

Look up the project history of your local NPP and see how long it was from planning approval to putting power on the grid.

[-] someacnt_@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It says it took 60 months on average. I guess from approval, it often took 8 years, so a decade makes sense.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 0 points 4 months ago

Which country builds a NPP in only 5 years, China?

[-] someacnt_@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
[-] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 4 months ago

Except we have better options than we did 10 years ago.

I'd be all for nuclear if we rolled back the clock to 2010 or so. As it stands, solar/wind/storage/hvdc lines can do the job. The situation moved and my opinion moved.

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
655 points (69.4% liked)

Memes

45657 readers
751 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS