11
submitted 1 week ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/collapse@slrpnk.net

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/10713443

For denial doesn’t only amount to rejecting the evidence, he argues – it also consists of denying our role in the climate crisis; absolving ourselves through “carbon offsets, hybrid cars, local purchases, recycling”. And in this, far more of us are implicated.

In some ways, this argument might not seem all that new. Multiple authors have pointed out that green capitalism, not rightwing deniers of the crisis, is our greatest obstacle to properly confronting the problem. DeLay agrees. The difference is the lens he brings to it – using psychoanalysis to explain the mechanisms behind denial.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] retrospectology@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

...if we cut emissions it stops climate change from getting even worse, killing even more people, destroying even more property and causing more mass migration, causing even further ecological collapse.

You're literally just asking "Why mitigate climate change?"

[-] rah@feddit.uk -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

stops climate change from getting even worse, killing even more people, destroying even more property and causing more mass migration, causing even further ecological collapse

And what is that going to solve exactly? What is it that this is a "solution" to?

[-] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
11 points (86.7% liked)

collapse of the old society

721 readers
535 users here now

to discuss news and stuff of the old world dying

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS