However, Lo of FoodID said that the study is indicative of broader problems. He said consumers believe the antibiotic-free meat industry is “trust, but verify,” but that it’s actually more “don’t ask, don’t tell.”
"Our perspective is the research and the paper highlight a systemic issue — it’s not about one farmer, rancher, retailer or restaurant chain,” he said.
[...]
Additionally, the use of antibiotics isn’t great for human health, because it leads to bacteria becoming more resistant to antibiotics designed to kill them, said Price. Antibiotic resistance leads to higher medical costs for humans, prolonged hospital stays and increased numbers of deaths.
Some beef ‘raised without antibiotics’ tests positive for antibiotics in study
(this includes those that were supposedly certified by independent organizations)
Let them be. If you want chicken friends to take care of that's fine, but you don't need to eat their menstruations.. That's weird.
Normally on sanctuaries they give them hormones to help prevent them from having so many ovulations. It's not healthy or normal for them to have as many as they do. Humans have bread them into a state that runs their bodies ragged.
Arguably though, if you give them those hormones its just fucking weird and not immoral.
Plus its not like chickens don't eat their own eggs, any one who's owned then can tell you what happens the moment one of them gets cracked.
Arguably the whole act of eating is yicky. As long as the food is good for you and doesn't taste bad does it matter how weird the source is? Especially when not everyone has enough to eat?