-47
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

In the end I don’t think internet users in rich powerful countries are the users most likely to benefit and invest their time into in the fediverse. They might be the ones with the most free time, money and privilege around computers which makes being on the leading edge of niche technologies far easier, but I don’t think using the fediverse vs commercial social media is thattt crucial of a difference for most (add a million qualifiers here except if you are black, queer, trans etc… I am talking in relative terms here) livimg inside the borders of colonial powers like the US, France, Germany etc..

Speaking as a hetero white dude who grew up with a decent amount of privilege the fediverse isn’t for the countless versions of me living within the borders of colonial powers…

It might have been programmers living within the borders of colonial powers that did most of the labor to create the fediverse, and most of the early users might have come from within colonial powers but I think it is important to recognize that the gift that the fediverse represents to the world is the capacity to empower people living outside the borders of colonial powers to own and run their own social networks instead of having some random Facebook employee who doesn’t have the time or basic knowledge of a country to make major decisions about what news accounts to moderate as dangerous spam and what to allow.

From a 30,000 foot view, speaking in broad terms and specific values and priorities, what do you think are the best strategies for flipping the script on the fediverse being mostly a tool used by people within the borders of colonial powers to one used by without and within?

I wonder about the capacities of fediverse software being useful as a compliment to HOT open street mapping type initiatives in the wake of disasters and just in general?

(Are server costs just generally cheaper/easier in colonial countries to run or is it purely a money and time thing? I don’t really know)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 45 points 1 month ago

its about mature infrastructure.

small, less mature countries have shit for internet resources.

[-] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes but I admire OP's optimism in challenging the Fediverse to somehow deploy probably the largest and most complex human endeavor ever conceived to quickly achieve economic parity between non and former-colonial powers. That's like the Principality of Sealand saying they're putting a man on the moon. I love it.

[-] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 1 month ago

small, less mature countries have shit for internet resources.

Isn't US internet memetically bad (in particular the rural one) compared to a "shit country" like Chile, one of the ones the US got paid to sabotage with military dictatorships?

[-] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Our data centers and backbone internet/Tier 1 internet providers are basically the best in the world. The US Department of Energy maintains a network with 46 Tbit/s connections between its labs.

this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
-47 points (31.8% liked)

Fediverse

26727 readers
149 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS