573
submitted 5 months ago by some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/news@lemmy.world

Fox News won't bother mentioning this to their viewers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

I don't blame people for giving up on a Sisyphean task

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They just don’t recognize that they’ll be crushed first when it rolls back. Maturity is learning not to commit all of your attention to the top of the mountain, but to always be mindful of the boulder.

[-] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Maturity is learning not to commit all of your attention to the top of the mountain, but to always be mindful of the boulder.

That is beautiful and so very true.

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I chuckled at the first commenter's description of this as a boulder, but honestly the metaphor is pretty robust.

[-] Sinful@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago
[-] stringere@leminal.space 2 points 5 months ago

Granite that I agree with the sediment.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Yep. Just vote and don't expect to get to the top. We're never getting there. We just vote and vote and vote and then eventually we die, pushing the same boulder the entire time.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

It’s far from ideal, but the problem is that we let it roll back every 4-8 years. If Democrats consistently won due to progressive policies, the candidates would inevitably become more progressive to capture more of the constituency. Disengagement and disenfranchisement consistently cause the boulder to fall, leading to the lack of overall progress.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

And because that doesn't happen, I just have to assume that Americans aren't nearly as progressive as everybody on the Internet thinks they are.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Don’t underestimate the efficacy of voter disenfranchisement and disengagement. Republicans don’t need to prop up Trump. People who loath him will vote for him simply due to party loyalty. Discrediting Biden is all it takes for a win.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

So everybody has to vote for someone they hate otherwise the other guy they hate will be in power.

Great democracy everybody. Glad the wrong lizard didn't win.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I’m not defending the system. I’m suggesting we use it until we have a better option.

Whether you realize it or not, comments like that drive disengagement. It imparts hopelessness, which leads some to apathy.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Which makes sense because I'm definitely hopeless

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

That’s fair. Try not to advocate hopelessness. It just hurts others.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

You're right. It's important to keep negative feelings to yourself. Cram them right down in the pit of your stomach and then smile and say "Yeah, this is exactly the sort of government I want and if you have a problem with it then you're a bad person."

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

You don’t need to play martyr. Get some help if you really want to address it. Trying to convince others to feel hopeless along with you won’t make you feel any better, and it can hurt others in the process.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Making people hopeful only to have their hopes crushed in the next election is a great way to get them to give up on voting

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Voting should be emotionless. It’s a civic responsibility to make a logical decision to benefit yourself and those you care about. Vote for whomever will do that more. Don’t expect perfect representation at that level of government.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Which is exactly what I've been saying this entire time: Vote, but don't expect it to help.

The strategy of telling voters that they can vote for change is what's caused Millennials and Gen Z to check out. Don't tell people our government is responsive or effective, because it isn't and then they'll get the wrong idea about how government actually works. Don't tell them they can vote for Hope & Change, because those aren't things our government provides.

[-] msage@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

They are getting crushed anyway.

Even without "both sides", the situation worldwide is fucked. And "neither side" is going to change much. Yes, one is worse, but the better side still offers a bandaid over a gushing wound.

So I don't really blame them.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

We just need to help them understand the system better. I voted third-party when was young, and many of my friends abstained. That was due to a lack of education about our government. It’s not about swaying them to vote one way or the other, but just to help them understand how our system functions. After that, if they want to vote for Trump with conviction, so be it. At least it’ll be an informed decision.

[-] msage@programming.dev 0 points 5 months ago

I will say it: fuck the system.

The sooner it's gone, the better.

It won't be pretty, but this isn't leading us to paradise either, we are killing the planet and can't even take the foot off the gas.

We need a hard reset, and it's coming. In the best scenario, the system is taken down before the enviromental collapse.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Are you an accelerationist? Do you believe making things worse faster will lead to systemic change for the better?

[-] msage@programming.dev 0 points 5 months ago

I believe the current path is leading to a bad ending, guaranteed.

And all I'm saying is that I don't blame young people who may think other options might lead to something better.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Anyone who believes there are more than two choices in this election was poorly educated on American democracy. I know I was when I voted Green Party at 20 years old. If I can help educate those that are as ill-informed as I was, I feel it’s my duty. After that, the choice is theirs.

[-] msage@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

The whole point I'm trying to make is that the system doesn't work, voting lesser of two evils never helped in any meaningful way.

We need to stop capitalism, or we will all die, or at the very least suffer greatly.

That's the whole point.

I'm not from the US, so I can't vote for either side anyway, but we are all fucked. I watch the children and feel sorry for letting them down. They will not grow up into a world of peace and prosperity, only desolation and dystopia.

So while yes, Orange man very bad, the system will kill us anyway. Fascism will take your country, but capitalism took our entire planet.

[-] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 months ago

It's like you're stuck in the water with a riptide pushing you away from shore. A really strong swimmer would just swim against it, but you're not, so you swim parallel to shore because then later you can swim back in. At least it's not pushing you further out.

Nope.

Just decide to quit and drown. This is what the young "I'll show you by not participating" crowd sounds like to me.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

I've been swimming sideways to get out of the riptide for 24 years now. When do I get to start swimming back to shore?

[-] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

Does drowning have any chance of ever getting you back?

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Does swimming parallel to the shore have a chance of ever getting me back?

[-] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Well, yes. That's the thing: If you give up, you drown, if you keep going parallel, you never know when the tide might turn. If you're 24 (that's how I interpret your previous comment), you've only had the option of voting in one presidential election so far. In that election, progressives completed the monumental task of voting out an incumbent proto-facist. And for all of Bidens flaws, there can't be much doubt that a lot has been heading in the right direction. Of course, there's still a huge task ahead, but the previous election shows that Trump can be kept out of office, and the past three years show that things can get better.

Step 1: Forgiving student loans, Step 2: Working to reform the system.

Step 1: Pardon certain drug-related crimes, Step 2: Work to reform drug laws.

Step 1: Massive infrastructure investments, Step 2: More investment in public goods

Step 1: EO's to protect reproductive rights, Step 2: Legislation to do the same.

My point is this: Biden has shown that he is working to make progress, and that he can actually get stuff done. The problem is that there's a whole lot that needs doing, much more than anyone can do in two terms. We need to keep getting the best option into office, and we need to spend the next four years to ensure that the best option next time is better than Biden is now. If Trump gets four years, I fear that we'll have a near impossible job.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm actually 42. This is my sixth presidential election. I'm old enough to know this post is writing a check our government can't cash. It's too broken.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago

It's broken because of GOP and you're willing to give GOP more power to break it further

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Calm your tits. I've been voting D like a good little neoliberal since 2000.

I don't need to give them more power. They've already elected two presidents without the popular vote, hold most of the Senate because it gives land more power than people, and the House because we haven't fixed representation in a century. Not to mention the fuckery in every single one of the states they can pull off.

The fact that Republicans are able to do that sort of shit is how it's broken. They're not the problem, they're a symptom of people winning game with broken mechanics. Like the end of Monopoly when one asshole has all the money.

[-] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

It doesn't necessarily mean getting pushed further out.

It can always get worse.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

That's the neat part: It always gets worse.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 months ago

No it's obviously only progressives fault dems keep only doing conservative like policies

this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
573 points (98.5% liked)

News

23305 readers
3644 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS