256
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago

True.... but I think we would have had more representation, as democrats would try to score political points.

It would have felt like we had some representation fighting against this, rather then 2 parties agreeing on a genocide.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

You’re getting all the representation you can get from Senate and House Democrats. Schumer spoke against this in January. Bernie repeated last month, and so on. Congress is now divided on this as a partisan issue, but ignorance puts it all on the president, whose office has been in support of Israel in this conflict since it began under Reagan. A Republican in office would only escalate this into a war with Iran after Palestine is eradicated.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Going around Congress to ship weapons to Israel flies in the face of the helpless president narrative you're trying to paint here.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Source on congressional evasion? The last sale of arms was completed months ago and only supplied last month. The next shipment is currently on hold.

https://www.axios.com/2024/05/05/israel-us-ammunition-shipment-hold

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

I didn’t see that. Thank you for the link. That was in December, before Netanyahu began indiscriminately killing Palestinians in Gaza, during the early stages of defense after the Iron Dome breach in October.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Going around Congress to ship weapons to Israel flies in the face of the helpless president narrative you’re trying to paint here.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I’m not painting a narrative. I’m simply aware that Republicans have historically emboldened Israel with the goal of an active war with Iran. They leverage Hamas, Hezbollah, and Houthis as justification to go hot with Iran. I’m still in stark disagreement that things would be better with Bush, or any other Republican in the presidency.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Democrats are speaking out though?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

And getting called trump supporting russians when we do.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I believe they’re talking about Democrat electors, like Schumer and Bernie. No one here is against speaking out or protesting. The topic is voting. If people abstain, Trump will win. His unwavering base will make sure of that.

Also, you said you’re not a democrat. Which is it? Or do you just manipulate your stance to fit the narrative you’re selling?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Also, you said you’re not a democrat.

Oh cool. Where did I say that?

Is it in the same chunk of your imagination where you assume I support trump because I don't love genocide like you do?

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

I thought you had written that you left the party years ago. My mistake. Also, accusing people of loving genocide is despicable and further discrediting to you. Of course I’m passionately against killing of any kind, especially when targeting a specific group.

I’m not defending Biden’s support of Israel. This post is about voting, and yes, I’m absolutely reluctantly voting for him to keep Trump from a second term. You are either completely ignorant to the implications of your comments or you are actively trying to get Trump into office.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Also, accusing people of loving genocide is despicable and further discrediting to you.

You didn't care when you were accusing me of supporting trump and by extension genocide. So deal with it.

Of course I’m passionately against killing of any kind, especially when targeting a specific group.

But are happy to scream false accusations at anyone who isn't willing to pretend that Biden's support for genocide is acceptable.

I’m not defending Biden’s support of Israel.

Really? Because you acted like I was a single issue voter for just pointing out that single issue voters exist and that Biden needs to adapt.

Of course adaptation might involve dropping support for genocide, so I can see why that would make you angry.

This post is about voting, and yes, I’m absolutely reluctantly voting for him to keep Trump from a second term.

I very much doubt that there's any reluctance involved, unless he drops his support for genocide.

You are either completely ignorant to the implications of your comments or you are actively trying to get Trump into office.

I'm trying to get Democrats to stop being the Other Genocide Party. Which bothers you.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I’m not angry. In fact, I’m quite well adjusted. You should consider paying more attention to your well being and less attention to opportunities to attack and misrepresent others online.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Yeah, they're speaking out against the protests. Biden even got in on it with his short speech recently finger wagging the student protests, in case you were wondering how much democrats care about acting against genocide.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago
[-] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Everyone knows trump is worse. The answer to hitler is not hitler-lite.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What is the answer? People are commenting like they can just abstain and everything will work out. I’m commenting as an anti-Trump voter. Provide a suggestion that isn’t whining about bad choices and I’ll listen.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

The answer is for people who voted for Biden in the 2020 primaries to apologize for putting us in this position. Otherwise they're just gonna do it again in 2028.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

How would an apology for voting change anything in the next election? You’ve legitimately lost me.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

It would demonstrate some self awareness from the people who created this situation. If they plan on behaving differently in the next primaries then it's worth it to hold my nose and vote for Biden again in the hopes of having someone substantially better in 2028.

The fact that there is no apology means whoever is elected in the 2028 primaries won't be any better. It's probably going to be HRC.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Are you talking about the DNC providing limited options in the primary, or those who voted in the primary? You can vote in any primary just by changing your registration. I’ve done it several times. I have no party loyalty. I’m loyal to my ideals and will vote in any primary that looks to benefit my ideals best.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

You can vote in any primary just by changing your registration.

I'm not sure what your point is here.

My point is I don't think the 2028 primaries are going to produce a better candidate so I'm not motivated to hold my nose any longer.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

What is holding your nose? Abstaining from voting? You’re not making any clear points.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

The answer is to continue to pressure democrats, known as "the good party", to actually do good things they claim they want to do but refuse to actually do.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I completely agree. I’m only commenting against the inaccuracy of protesting at the polls. The topic of this thread and post is supporting Biden in the election, not in his support of Israel.

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] beardown@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Democrats are speaking out

Actually, Democrats are funding and arming a genocide against Gazans

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Find a list of people in Congress who have spoken out. What do they all have in common?

[-] beardown@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

That they have not influenced policy on this issue at all and that they will be shortly electorally defeated by AIPAC endorsed candidates?

this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
256 points (93.2% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4561 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS