654
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Key Points

  • The wealth of the top 1% hit a record $44.6 trillion at the end of the fourth quarter.
  • All of the gains came from stock holdings thanks to an end-of-year rally.
  • Economists say the rising stock market is giving an added boost to consumer spending through what is known as the “wealth effect.”

The wealth of the top 1% hit a record $44.6 trillion at the end of the fourth quarter, as an end-of-year stock rally lifted their portfolios, according to new data from the Federal Reserve.

The total net worth of the top 1%, defined by the Fed as those with wealth over $11 million, increased by $2 trillion in the fourth quarter. All of the gains came from their stock holdings. The value of corporate equities and mutual fund shares held by the top 1% surged to $19.7 trillion from $17.65 trillion the previous quarter.

While their real estate values went up slightly, the value of their privately held businesses declined, essentially canceling out all other gains outside of stocks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago

Be the change you want to see in the world

But it won’t accomplish much, we have terrorism (or freedom fighters depending on your side) as is and the ruling class isn’t swayed

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee -1 points 7 months ago

"Terrorism" is a nonsense word. State terror forces who exist to brutalize and terrorize populations into stillness so much like the fucking grave are never terrorists. If I post myself consentually making out with another adult I find hot, I'd be one in like fifteen time zones.

Its nonsense, and if we want to go to the 'real' definition of terrorism; using violence to scare people into your agenda; that's literally all a state is.

Not raking an intentional editorial position on any kind of violence here; just that innocence is no protection, and truth is no defense.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago

Terrorism is the use of force to achieve a political objective by a group of people not internationally recognized as a state

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

So Los Angeles is a state? Chicago is a state?

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

Uh, yeah, those are state entities. They have governments.

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

But the KKK isnt, because...???

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Because it was a private organization, not a government organization. Its violent actions could be considered state-funded terrorism, but not state violence itself.

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

But what about the times it was literally an organ of the state? That has happened, especially while the Volstead act is in effect. Or when they all take off their badges and put on their white hoods, because basically every cop is in the KKK?

You're stumbling through lots of tautology and appeals to authority (the UN was formed post ww2, did we not have states before then? What about all the cops doing terrorism before the UN existed?) But not actually defining anything.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

It’s not recognized as such

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

By whom? I can't tell the fucking difference, its most if the same guys. Explain to me how its not the same thing.

Hell, in various time periods, its been official. The state itself has recognized them, used them for law enforcement, or offered members sweetheart deals during recruitment.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The U.N. is the convention for recognizing statehood

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

So no state ever participated in a world war?

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Do you realize what year it is?

If you want to go back to colonial time then a state was just what Europe recognizes. Which meant that Africa, America, and most of Asia were up for taking. Convention changes

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

City states exist

But those are more commonly recognized as part of the larger USA state

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

But the KKK isn't. Because...???

And why are 'states' special exclusions where we use a different word?

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago

I already answered that the first time you said it

Because when the states came up with the rules they decided to give them exclusions

For states the general equivalent is war crime and the resolution is that the common person that belongs to the group isn’t punished as much as the leaders or people who commit those actions

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

So the states came up with the special category of state and the rules about being states. That's some crazy bootstrapping. Pure tautology. Does that mean you and I can be states?

Also, lol, someone being punished for war crimes. Such an adorably twee concept.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

If the UN recognizes us then yes

People are punished for war crimes but your state has to recognize the ICC and allow a trial

this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
654 points (98.4% liked)

News

23260 readers
3751 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS