this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
59 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13967 readers
687 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
sweet_pecan@hexbear.net
a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net
thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net
context@hexbear.net
Infamousblt@hexbear.net
Sulvy@hexbear.net
59
The only valid criticism of Marx as a philosopher must be that he was too involved in human affairs (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago by aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago

That and critiquing movies you haven’t seen like Zizek.

Does that mean youtubers are the modern day philosophers? 🤔