184
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dill@lemmy.one 18 points 1 year ago

What's the public sentiment on this verdict going to be? I have not been following the case.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think he was found not guilty. Anyone that continues to demonize him should probably step up with more information than came out at the trial before they open their mouths again and ruin a man's career.

I'm not sure where the first witch hunt came from, but I'd lay it at the feet of social media platforms like Reddit causing an echo chamber that drove it.

The fact that he was abandoned by the studios and the people he worked with said more about them than it does about him.

[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

A verdict in a court of law is based on what is presented, not on what happened. This is what makes it possible for people to commit a crime, and get away with it (or get framed for something that they didn't do).

This is a question that I do not want you to answer here, but one to ponder:

If your son/nephew/younger was up for a part in a project that was directed by, and starring Kevin Spacey? What weight would you assign to that Not Guilty due to insufficient evidence verdict?

[-] vinzen@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

Where does the judge say that evidence was insufficient for a verdict? I missed that part.

Also, are we going to start questioning every verdict as if any accusation was true, even when proved differently in court?

[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

"Where does the judge say that evidence was insufficient for a verdict? I missed that part."

The primary cause of your confusion is your insistence on missing the point.

"Also, are we going to start questioning every verdict as if any accusation was true, even when proved differently in court?"

Again, missing the point. Who is talking about every verdict, besides yourself? This is Kevin Spacey specific.

Do you believe that not getting convicted means that the accused did not do the thing that they are accused of?

Is it your personal belief that Kevin Spacey is completely harmless with respect to sexual predation? Does your confidence extend far enough that you would have no qualms about a young male relative of yours work on a movie with Kevin Spacey?

[-] vinzen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Reading you comment I searched for the differences between being “not guilty” and being “innocent” and boy I didn’t know enough about the US justice system. I thought a “not guilty” verdict was the same as “the guy didn’t do it”. I stand corrected, though. Thanks for your input.

[-] Syndic@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not sure where you're from. But that principle by no means is limited to the US but pretty much present in every western country.

The whole idea is to prevent false convictions at the cost of guilty people walking free if their guilt can't be proven.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 39 points 1 year ago

Calling it a social media witchunt is a bit trite. A number of people came forward, detailing a history that spanned years. His claims that they were motivated 'by money' and painting it as 'aspiring actors' when we're talking a group that includes professionals with their own VERY well established careers also reeks of the rear end of the equine.

[-] Kichae@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

Yeah, let's not confuse "not guilty" with "not a creepy old man". The bar for the state taking away your rights based on your activity is fairly high -- as it should be -- but not being able to produce sufficient evidence of acts that don't leave a whole lot of physical evidence behind doesn't make the accusations false.

It just makes them not enough.

And, I'm sorry to everyone out there who seem weirdly motivated to want to believe that accusers are overwhelmingly liars, but his hand-waving away of the accusations was not confidence inspiring.

[-] VivaceMoss@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Let's not forget that multiple accusers up and fucking died while waiting for their day in court, also.

Kinda hard to provide testimony that could have been compelling for the court when a number of key witnesses don't survive the trial.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Multiple sources i've read indicate that Spacey seems to believe he can climb right back on top of the A-list again now this court case is over.

[-] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It was around the qanon situation

And after Weinstein

Edit: just read the harassment stuff on Wikipedia.

I'm not sure if this trial tells anything about the whole truth with all that going on

[-] monobot@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Even the career is not important, whole life is ruined. Just imagine family and friends all ar least asking about it and some leaving you.

While I agree there should be severe and swift punishment for sexual offences, there should be some punishment for false accusations. I know that sometimes is just not prooved and sometimes it is in legally gray area, so not automatic, but if it can be prooven that someone was intentional lying - then there should be consequences.

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

but if it can be prooven that someone was intentional lying - then there should be consequences.

this is already the case today. thank you for playing.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unfortunately, in most cases, there's no real-world way to punish false accusation. The bar of proof for that sort of thing is, and should be, extraordinarily high. You pretty much have to have a confession.

Also, charging false accusers has a chilling effect on victims. Think how manipulative abusers are. "See what happened to that chick on the news? Go ahead, call the cops. You got nothin' you dumb bitch, 'cept maybe a future in a concrete and steel cage. Here's the phone, I'll dial for you."

[-] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I like how you gave the imaginary person an accent.

[-] Syndic@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

While I agree there should be severe and swift punishment for sexual offences, there should be some punishment for false accusations.

What are you talking about? There are punishment for false accusations. But that of course has the very same legal requirements of proven beyong reasonable doubt as any other accusation.

And no, just because someone is not proven guilty doesn't mean that the accusation is false. It literally just means that, the court couldn't prove the accusation and so couldn't punish the accused.

[-] jackfrost@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

While I agree there should be severe and swift punishment for sexual offences, there should be some punishment for false accusations. I know that sometimes is just not prooved and sometimes it is in legally gray area, so not automatic, but if it can be prooven that someone was intentional lying - then there should be consequences.

But we actually have pretty clearly defined legal systems for slander, libel and defamation?

[-] victron@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

His career is ruined! That's what we all wanted, right? /s

[-] Lols@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago
[-] Lols@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

actually no i wanted him in jail too

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
184 points (92.6% liked)

News

23305 readers
3649 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS