214

Let’s Thank the Alabama Supreme Court (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 9 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I never thought I’d be grateful to the Alabama Supreme Court for anything, but now I am. With its decision deeming frozen embryos to be children under state law, that all-Republican court has done the impossible. It has awakened the American public, finally, to the peril of the theocratic future toward which the country has been hurtling.

Actually stopping that means both volunteering and, if you can afford it, donating

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net -1 points 9 months ago

That's the NYT for you

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago

So, newspapers shouldn't print opinion pieces you don't agree with?

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 9 months ago

I didn't say that at all. Just that the NYT has a tendency to put a right-wing spin on everything

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

lol! I've heard Trump scream a million times that it was a Left wing rag.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/12/media/donald-trump-new-york-times-legal-fees/index.html

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

That's because Trump thinks any media that doesn't praise him as the smartest, richest, handsomest, and most powerful man in the world is a "Left wing rag". I'm sure now that Faux News was forced to add fact checkers to avoid another devastating lawsuit he thinks they're "liberal" and "woke" now as well.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 6 points 9 months ago

That's called working the ref.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

They printed a list of all his lies since taking office.

Working that ref pretty damn hard, wouldn't you say?

https://www.businessinsider.com/new-york-times-used-full-page-to-print-all-trump-lies-since-taking-office-2017-6

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 months ago

Given the frequency that you see stories in the form " something good happened, here's why that's bad for Biden" I'd say it's succeeded

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago

So, you're saying their secret agenda is to report both sides of the issues?

Shocking!!!

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 months ago

Not in the least; they prioritize access over truth, and tend to spin things in a fairly conservative way.

this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024

214 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19241 readers

2374 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News