625
submitted 8 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

It’s just not that easy for some folks. Especially people who have developed eating disorders.

[-] x4740N@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

I know this might not sound positive but people with eating disorders should try to speak to a therapist about it because eating disorders can end up being horrible for your health

[-] Darkblue@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Although it is true what you say and I do agree, I also read between your lines that maybe you don't know how difficult and (life)long that process is.

An eating disorder is a disease/issue that honestly isn't solvable, you carry that weak point for the rest of your life and will have to battle it. Which with eating is extra difficult, since you have to eat. You can't stay sober from food.

(But maybe I misunderstood your words (being written text without further context). )

[-] Wolf_359@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

This is why I'm not against drugs like Ozempic for those who need it.

I used a new medication to make me not want opiates. Used it for about two years until I had enough healthy habits in place to actually not want opiates. Been clean for 6 years and off the medication for over a year without issue.

Never would have gotten clean without it so it makes sense to me how people end up obese.

[-] fushuan@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

It's not about being easy, it's about being able to measure. I've been completely unable to regulate my food intake for a long time until I took it real seriously (therapeutic fasting. It's a thing, it's very extreme, if you can avoid it do it) and kind of reset my eating habits. Now that I'm slowly increasing my caloric intake to what someone on the weight I aim to be should consume (2m calories a day, healthy for someone with 90kg), having the pero 100g indication is extremely helpful for me since I can estimate how much stuff is taxing my daily budget, and I'm discovering some incredible cheat foods (stuff I really enjoy eating that fills me and has low calories).

What I mean to say is that having the per 100g information is very valuable for anyone that cares to control their caloric intake. Sure, you don't have it in restaurants and stuff but with enough experience you tend to learn to estimate dishes so you can compensate beforehand or afterwards to not exceed your budget.

Its all about caloric intake, some people have it real hard to keep it under control due to eating disorders or family customs, but it really is just that.

[-] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I am confused by the instruction "if you can avoid it do it."

[-] fushuan@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

Sorry, I meant that if you can avoid doing it, do avoid it <3

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

It should be interpreted: "if there's any way that you can avoid using this technique/ therapy, then you should absolutely go out of your way to avoid having to use this ~~torture regemin~~ therapy."

[-] UlfKirsten@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago

Please tell me about your cheat foods

[-] fushuan@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Sure! As always, food being filling depends a lot on the person same with tastyness. Anyway, one dish I really like is guacamole, it's usually eaten with bread, and that bad. Recently I've taken a liking to eatich raw spinach with some oil (a cheap refillable spray will let you throw just what you need, usually 60kcal are enough to dress it well) and about 125g guacamole which is somewhat around 250kcal from the brand I buy. The guacamole and oil give a lot of flavour to the spinach, which has a strong texture and takes awhile to eat everything. It's less than 400kcal in total, and quite healthy.

Instead of buying fruit juices, which even natural ones have quite a lot of sugar and thus calories, I've taken a liking to drinking vegetable soups, which basically cost the same in the store and have a fraction of the caloric cost while having quite a lot of vatamins. Again, I personally enjoy it a lot.

Besides that it's all about eating stuff I would not usually eat. Lentils, chickpeas and other legumes are pretty good in nutrients and fill you a lot.

Everything considered, it's more about not eating an exaggerated amount of food, and the fasting really helped me reset my habits. Before I wouldn't have considered eating fruit instead some bag fries, but now that it's been a while that I haven't eaten fries, I'm slowly getting used to eating healthy stuff since going from zero to vegetables+fruits is incredible.

To summarize, lightly dressed spinach & guacamole salad and vegetable soups are my "cheat foods". Food I really enjoy that fills me up with a low caloric intake.

Edit: forgot about the pear cherry tomatoes, it's a variety of cherry tomatoes that has more "meat" and is sweeter, but still has fuckall calories so buying a bunch instead of potatoes and eating them all is totally fine.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Not quite awake yet. At first I read: "people who have developed eating dinosaurs."

this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
625 points (97.9% liked)

News

23260 readers
3751 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS