71
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
71 points (97.3% liked)
Asklemmy
43019 readers
1084 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
And vegans wonder why they have a reputation for being overly dramatic and preachy 🤦
If you want sane people to listen, maybe take it down several hundred notches..
I mean to be fair what he said is exactly how the milk industry works.
I say this as a meat eater, that intensive production shit should be illegal even at the cost of reducing meat supply as traditional, more ethical, methods are insufficient to meet our (unsustainable) meat demand. Well at least until lab-grown meat becomes mainstream enough.
Sane people usually don’t listen, though. No matter how you put it, you’re always the crazy preachy vegan. Insane people respond by saying how they’ll order and extra steak just to spite you. It’s weird.
Also, RE: climate change. Normal arguments don’t do anything for the average person. That’s why you get the crazy stuff nowadays.
Sorry, I don’t find any of the actions I described above to be sane. And if you think I’m being sensational, you haven’t watched Dominion yet, and you should. I was actually just describing the “normal” aspects of the dairy industry; the reality of the conditions these living, thinking, feeling beings live in are even worse.
“It is no measure of health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society.” -Krishnamurti
We have this reputation solely because people feel threatened and offended when you tell them that you refuse to eat animal products. They suddenly start being confrontational and refuse to listen to your reasoning.
It's like arguing with little children who plug their ears and sing while you're trying to explain that 30% of the reason we're in a climate crisis is their overconsumption of animal products, derived from creatures capable of emotion, able to see, hear, and smell not unlike you and me.
And those conversations do not come up unsolicited but provoked by meat eaters asking "but why would you do that to yourself?"
But maybe I'm being overly dramatic and preachy 🤦
If I didn't completely kill your interest in the topic, check out Ed Winters on YouTube.
Not even close to true. If you tell me in the same way that I'd tell you my dietary preference, I wouldn't mind at all. I'm not in the business of telling other people what to eat or not eat and as long as you extend me the same courtesy, we should get along just fine.
It's only when you go out of your way to shame people into agreement like the comment I first replied to that I have any problem with vegans.
Yeah, weird how people will confront you about it when you're being needlessly aggressive and judgmental and not feel like listen to THAT kind of reasoning 🙄
It's like arguing with a holier than thou arrogant person that insists that anyone who doesn't live their lives like them are wilfully ignorant children. Funny how most of us frightfully ignorant meat-eaters aren't very receptive when being treated that way.
Not true. In this specific case, nobody asked. A very openended asklemmy prompt is NOT the equivalent of your strawman
Yeah, you very much are, especially the latter.
I already know a lot about the topic and yeah, anyone recommended after such arrogant tirades is not someone I'd be likely to check out.
If his approach is anything like yours, I expect he'll be showing me gruesome slaughterhouse footage and calling me an evil ignoramus within the first minute of every video.
The point is that this is not like having different favourite colours.
One "dietary preference" slaughters intelligent beings with complex social behaviour and emotions, the other does not.
One contributes a massive amount of greenhouse gases and thus fuels climate change, the other's impact is much, much smaller.
One degrades soils and pollutes rivers, the other less.
One leads to zoonotic epidemics, the other does not.
One leads to incredible water consumption, the other much less.
In short, one "preference" has a massive negative impact on many aspects of life and the earth, the other is a plant-based diet. Consequences!
If the description above is not dramatic the idk.
Concepts like rape just don't exist in the animal kingdom. It's like the standard way of having offspring.
Same for the thing about taking children away.
Did you forget humans are animals? If you don’t like using the word rape to describe sexually violating an animal, there’s another one we’ve come up with… bestiality.
Are you seriously trying to say humans are the only species who should have a right not to be sexually violated or have their children taken from them and killed? Since we know that cows are thinking, feeling, emotional creatures capable of forming strong family bonds… what exactly is it about humans that makes them special in that way?
Humans are special in more than one characteristic. One of them is that humans have consensual intercourse and have a word for and laws against intercouse that isn't.
Cows don't have that. Animals in general don't have that. You wouldn't say one shark is raping another. Or lions are raping each other. Unless you are really missing the point at least
Bestiality is another term you don't seem to understand. Artifical insemination does not involve the performance of sexual acts from the human's point of view.
It's a human term from a human's perspective.
You wouldn't call it Bestiality when a dog humps your leg. the animal's perspective does not matter here. It should be that way because animals cannot in a meaningful way consent.
I don't agree with the term sexual violation.
In a perfect way no animal would ever die, but nature is eat or be eaten most of the time. Cows usually are the ones that will be eaten.
Choose one
I didn't say all characteristics so I don't think I have to
Yep, totally natural way of having offspring
CW: faecal matter
Not what I said. Something being unnatural doesn't make it rape though.
In vitro insemination in humans also isn't rape.
No, but you keep arguing by applying naturalistic fallacy.
You keep arguing by anthropomorphic fallacy
You don't need to get anthropomorphic to argue the ethical case. Besides, I have given many more arguments than the ethical aspects, while you only point to "nature", so I will not engage in this discussion any further.
Thank you for the exchange though, and I'd be happy if you would reflect on your views one day and consider the perspective of other beings.